PurposeTo evaluate the contribution of fixational saccades toward fixation instability in strabismic monkeys.MethodsBinocular eye movements were measured as six experimental monkeys (five strabismic monkeys and one monkey with downbeat nystagmus) and one normal monkey fixated targets of two shapes (Optotype, Disk) and two sizes (0.5°, 2°) during monocular and binocular viewing. Fixational saccades were detected using an unsupervised clustering algorithm.ResultsWhen compared with the normal monkey, amplitude and frequency of fixational saccades in both the viewing and nonviewing eye were greater in 3 of 5 strabismic monkeys (1-way ANOVA on ranks P < 0.001; median amplitude in the normal monkey viewing eye: 0.33°; experimental animals: median amplitude range 0.20–0.82°; median frequency in the normal monkey: 1.35/s; experimental animals: median frequency range 1.3–3.7/s). Increase in frequency of fixational saccades was largely due to quick phases of ongoing nystagmus. Fixational saccade amplitude was increased significantly (3-way ANOVA; P < 0.001) but by small magnitude depending on target shape and size (mean difference between disk and optotype targets = 0.02°; mean difference between 2° and 0.5° targets = 0.1°). Relationship between saccade amplitude and the Bivariate Contour Ellipse Area (BCEA) was nonlinear, showing saturation of saccade amplitude. Fixation instability in depth was significantly greater in strabismic monkeys (vergence BCEA: 0.63 deg2–2.15 deg2) compared with the normal animal (vergence BCEA: 0.15 deg2; P < 0.001).ConclusionsIncreased fixational instability in strabismic monkeys is only partially due to increased amplitude and more frequent fixational saccades. Target parameter effects on fixational saccades are similar to previous findings of target effects on BCEA.

During binocular viewing, many strabismic subjects choose the eye of fixation depending on the retinotopic location of a visual target. Here, we compare eye choice behavior when orienting to visual and non-visual (auditory) targets. METHODS. Eye movements were measured in two head-fixed exotropic strabismic monkeys in a saccadic task involving either a visual or an auditory stimulus (no visual target information or feedback) during monocular or binocular viewing. The stimulus was one of 21 visual or auditory targets arranged 10°apart in a 7 × 3 array at a distance of 57 cm in an otherwise dark room. Fixation preference was calculated by recording the incidence of using a specific eye to acquire the target at any location. RESULTS. Spatial patterns of fixation preference were observed in both monkeys for both visual and auditory stimuli; targets to the far right were acquired by the right eye, and targets to the far left were acquired by the left eye. For visual targets, the border for a change in fixation preference occurred in between the visual axes of the fixating and deviated eyes (variable in the two animals). In contrast, the border for fixation change remained near the cranio-center during the auditory task. During monocular viewing, fixation switching was observed only at the extremities during visual tasks; during the auditory task, fixation preference was similar to that observed during binocular viewing. CONCLUSIONS. Fixation preference persists for invisible auditory targets. Our data suggest that visual suppression could modify underlying eye choice behavior that functions independently from vision.

PurposeWe examined whether congenital impairment of disparity vergence in infantile esotropia (ET) exists in children with short duration ET (≤3 months) compared with long-duration ET and healthy controls. A short duration of misalignment would allow for a substantial amount of balanced binocular input during the critical period of binocular disparity development.MethodsA total of 19 children aged 5 to 12 years and treated for infantile ET with a short (≤3 months; n = 10) or long (≥5 months; n = 9) duration of constant misalignment before alignment were enrolled. A total of 22 healthy control children were enrolled as a comparison group. Eye movements during disparity vergence and accommodative vergence were recorded using an EyeLink 1000 binocular eye tracker. Mean response gain was compared between and within groups to determine the effect of duration of misalignment and viewing condition.ResultsCompared with controls, children with short (P = 0.002) and long (P < 0.001) duration infantile ET had reduced response gains for disparity vergence, but not for accommodative vergence (P = 0.19).ConclusionsRegardless of duration of misalignment, children with infantile ET had reduced disparity vergence, consistent with a congenital impairment of disparity vergence in infantile ET. Although early correction of misalignment increases the likelihood that some level of binocular disparity sensitivity will be present, normal levels may never be achieved.