While music information retrieval (MIR) has made substantial progress in automatic analysis of audio similarity for Western music, it remains unclear whether these algorithms can be meaningfully applied to cross-cultural analyses of more diverse samples. Here we collected perceptual ratings from 62 participants using a global sample of 30 traditional songs, and compared these ratings against both pre-existing expert annotations and state-of-the-art audio similarity algorithms. We found that different methods of perceptual ratings all produced similar, moderate levels of inter-rater reliability comparable to previous studies, but that agreement between human and automated methods was always low regardless of the specific methods used to calculate musical similarity. Our findings suggest that current MIR methods are unable to measure cross-cultural music similarity in perceptually meaningful ways. We propose future directions to enable meaningful automatic analysis of all the world’s music.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.