These results confirm the genetic contribution to PVR and the implication of SMAD7 and TNF locus in the development of PVR. This finding may have implications for understanding the mechanisms of PVR and could provide a potential new therapeutic target for PVR prophylaxis.

. Purpose:  Several clinical trials have established the efficacy of ranibizumab therapy administered every 4 weeks to treat exudative age‐related macular degeneration (ARMD). Bevacizumab appears to be a cost‐effective alternative to ranibizumab, although an optimal injection schedule has not yet been determined. In this study, we set out to determine whether bevacizumab treatment in exudative ARMD every 6 or 8 weeks is non‐inferior to bevacizumab treatment every 4 weeks. Methods:  A total of 191 patients with exudative ARMD were randomly assigned to a 1‐year continuous regimen of intravitreal bevacizumab every 4 (n = 64), 6 (n = 63) or 8 weeks (n = 64). The primary outcome was visual acuity change after 1 year of treatment. Results:  In all three treatment groups, visual acuity improved between baseline and 1 year. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean change of visual acuity score at 1 year for bevacizumab administered every 4 (1.96 ± 13.70), 6 (1.60 ± 10.98) or 8 weeks (5.98 ± 8.88). Reduction in central retinal thickness was observed in all three study groups. At 1 year, the mean decrease in central foveal thickness ranged from 86 ± 97 μm in the every 6 weeks group to 109 ± 90 μm in the group every 8 weeks group (p = 0.30). Conclusion:  At 1 year, bevacizumab administered every 6 or 8 weeks was not inferior to therapy administered every 4 weeks.

Genetic profiling of patients with RRD can improve the predictability of PVR in addition to the well-known clinical biomarkers. This validated formula could be a new tool in our current clinical practice in order to identify those patients at high risk of developing PVR.