Exposure of nanomaterials (NMs) to
biological medium results in
their direct interaction with biomolecules and the formation of a
dynamic biomolecular layer known as the biomolecular corona. Despite
numerous published data on nano-biointeractions, the role of protein
glycosylation in the formation, characteristics, and fate of such
nano-biocomplexes has been almost completely neglected, although most
serum proteins are glycosylated. This study aimed to systematically
investigate the differences in interaction of metallic NPs with glycosylated
vs nonglycosylated transferrin. To reach this aim, we compared interaction
mechanisms between differently sized, shaped, and surface-functionalized
silver NMs and gold NMs to commercially available human transferrin
(TRF), a glycosylated protein, and to its nonglycosylated recombinant
form (ngTRF). Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was also included in the
study for comparative purposes. Characterization of NMs was performed
using transmission electron microscopy and dynamic and electrophoretic
light scattering techniques. Fluorescence quenching and circular dichroism
methods were used to evaluate protein binding constants on the nanosurface
and conformational changes after the protein–NM interactions,
respectively. Competitive binding of TRF, ngTRF, and BSA to the surface
of different NMs was evaluated by separating them after extraction
from protein corona by gel electrophoresis following quantification
with a commercial protein assay. The results showed that the binding
strength between NMs and transferrin and the changes in the secondary
protein structure largely depend not only on NM physicochemical properties
but also on the protein glycosylation status. Data gained by this
study highlight the relevance of protein glycosylation for all future
design, development, and efficacy and safety assessment of NMs.
Biochemical and biological properties of glycoconjugates are strongly determined by the specifi c structure of its glycan parts. Glycosylation, the covalent attachment of sugars to proteins and lipids, is very complex and highly-coordinated process involving > 250 gene products. Defi ciency of glycosylation enzymes or transporters results in impaired glycosylation, and consequently pathological modulation of many physiological processes. Inborn defects of glycosylation enzymes, caused by the specifi c mutations, lead to the development of rare, but severe diseases -congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDGs). Up today, there are more than 45 known CDGs. Their clinical manifestations range from very mild to extremely severe (even lethal) and unfortunately, only three of them can be eff ectively treated nowadays. CDG symptoms highly vary, though some are common for several CDG types but also for other unrelated diseases, especially neurological ones, leaving the possibility that many CDGs cases are under-or misdiagnosed. Glycan analysis of serum transferrin (by isoelectric focusing or more sophisticated methods, such as HPLC (high-performance liquid chromatography) or MALDI (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization)) or serum N-glycans (by MS), enzyme activity assays and DNA sequence analysis are the most frequently used methods for CDG screening and identifi cation, since no specifi c tests are available yet. In this review we summarize the current knowledge on the clinical, biochemical and genetic characteristic of distinct CDGs, as well as existing diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, aiming to contribute to the awareness on the existence of these rare diseases and encourage the eff orts to elucidate its genetic background, improve diagnostics and develop new strategies for their treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.