We report that the behavior of a low-energy π plasmon excitation in a single layer graphene (SLG) can be modified by doping external potassium (K) atoms, a feature demanded to realize the graphene plasmonics. Using high-resolution electron-energy-loss spectroscopy, we find that upon K-doping the π plasmon energy increases by 1.1 eV due to the K-induced electron density up to n = 7 × 1013 cm−2 in SLG. The four modified dispersions for different K-dopings, however, are found to merge into a single universal curve when plotted in the dimensionless coordinates indicating that the unique plasmonic character of SLG is preserved despite the K-dopings.
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the color stability of provisional restorative materials fabricated by 3D printing, dental milling, and conventional materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS For the experimental groups, two commercially available 3D-printing provisional resins (E-Dent 100; EnvisionTEC GmbH, Germany & VeroGlaze™; Stratasys®, USA), two dental milling blocks (PMMA Disk; Yamahachi Dental Co., Japan & Telio®CAD; Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Liechtenstein), and two conventional materials (Alike™; GC Co., Japan & Luxatemp automix plus; DMG, Germany) were used. The water sorption and solubility test were (n=10, respectively) carried out according to ISO4049:2000 (International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland). For the color stability test (n=10), coffee and black tea were used as staining solutions, and the specimens were stored for 12 weeks. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD using SPSS version 22.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA) ( P <.05). RESULTS Alike and Veroglaze showed the highest values and Luxatemp showed the lowest water sorption. In the color stability test, the ΔE of conventional materials varied depending on the staining solution. PMMA milling blocks showed a relatively low ΔE up to 4 weeks, and then significantly increased after 8 weeks ( P <.05). 3D-printed materials exhibited a high ΔE or a significant increase over time ( P <.05). CONCLUSION The degree of discoloration increased with time, and a visually perceptible color difference value (ΔE) was shown regardless of the materials and solutions. PMMA milled and 3 D-printed materials showed more rapid change in discoloration after 8 weeks.
Objective This review evaluated the change in treatment outcomes after conversion from conventional removable partial denture (RPD) to implant‐assisted removable partial denture (IARPD). The patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs), objective parameters for evaluation of functional performance, and biological and mechanical complication were evaluated. Materials and Methods This systematic review was based on the Cochrane review methodology and followed the criteria of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (PRISMA). We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus up to April 3, 2019. After the initial search, additional electronic and hand searches were performed to identify further studies, ongoing studies, and gray literature, without restrictions on language, year of publication, or publication type. Results In total, 6,544 non‐duplicate articles were identified, and 31 were eligible for full‐text search. Finally, 19 publications based on 13 independent studies were selected. In the meta‐analysis, general patient satisfaction was significantly increased (p < .05), and the improved mastication was remarkable oral function. In oral health‐related quality of life, the oral health impact profile score was significantly improved, and improvements of physical pain and psychological disability were prominent (p < .05). Masticatory performance was improved in terms of maximum bite force, active occlusal contact area, and mandibular jaw movement (p < .05). The weighted mean survival rate of implants was 96.60%. Conclusions After conversion from conventional RPD to IARPD, the PROMs and masticatory performance significantly improved in partially edentulous patients under mandibular Kennedy classification I.
Objectives To compare the clinical treatment outcomes of maxillary four‐implant retained overdentures with either splinted (bar) attachments or non‐splinted (ball) attachments. Material and Methods Forty participants who were dissatisfied with their existing conventional maxillary complete dentures were included in this randomized controlled trial. Six months after implant placement, a definitive prosthesis was inserted. Implant success, condition of peri‐implant tissue, prosthodontic maintenance and complications, and patient satisfaction were assessed. Outcomes were recorded at baseline, prosthesis delivery, and at 3 and 12 months following prosthesis delivery, and a statistical analysis was performed. Results Thirty‐two of the forty patients completed the 1‐year follow‐up and had their treatment outcomes evaluated. The mean marginal bone loss after 1 year of loading was 0.34 ± 0.88 mm, and there were no significant differences between the two groups. Plaque index, gingival index and bleeding on probing were significantly higher in the bar group (p<.001), and the implant success rate of the bar group was significantly lower than that of the ball group (p=.028). The most frequent prosthodontic maintenance and complication issue was the need to change the bar clip or O‐ring as a result of retention loss. Patient satisfaction did not differ between the two groups except for aesthetics at 3 months. Conclusions Within the limitations of this study, the maxillary 4‐implant retained overdenture exhibited predictable results regardless of the attachment systems (ball or bar) in the 1‐year follow‐up period. The bar group was more vulnerable than the ball group with respect to maintaining peri‐implant tissue health.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.