OBJECTIVERestoring the proper sagittal alignment in adult spinal deformity (ASD) can improve radiological and clinical outcomes, but pseudarthrosis including rod fracture (RF) is a common problematic complication. The purpose of this study was to analyze the methods for reducing the incidence of RF in deformity correction of ASD.METHODSThe authors retrospectively selected 178 consecutive patients (mean age 70.8 years) with lumbar degenerative kyphosis (LDK) who underwent deformity correction with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were classified into the non-RF group (n = 131) and the RF group (n = 47). For predicting the crucial factors of RF, patient factors, radiographic parameters, and surgical factors were analyzed.RESULTSThe overall incidence of RF was 26% (47/178 cases), occurring in 42% (42/100 cases) of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), 7% (5/67 cases) of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with posterior column osteotomy, 18% (23/129 cases) of cobalt chrome rods, 49% (24/49 cases) of titanium alloy rods, 6% (2/36 cases) placed with the accessory rod technique, and 32% (45/142 cases) placed with the 2-rod technique. There were no significant differences in the incidence of RF regarding patient factors between two groups. While both groups showed severe sagittal imbalance before operation, lumbar lordosis (LL) was more kyphotic and pelvic incidence (PI) minus LL (PI-LL) mismatch was greater in the RF group (p < 0.05). Postoperatively, while LL and PI-LL did not show significant differences between the two groups, LL and sagittal vertical axis correction were greater in the RF group (p < 0.05). Nonetheless, at the last follow-up, the two groups did not show significant differences in radiographic parameters except thoracolumbar junctional angles. As for surgical factors, use of the cobalt chrome rod and the accessory rod technique was significantly greater in the non-RF group (p < 0.05). As for the correction method, PSO was associated with more RFs than the other correction methods, including LLIF (p < 0.05). By logistic regression analysis, PSO, preoperative PI-LL mismatch, and the accessory rod technique were crucial factors for RF.CONCLUSIONSGreater preoperative sagittal spinopelvic malalignment including preoperative PI-LL mismatch was the crucial risk factor for RF in LDK patients 65 years or older. For restoring and maintaining sagittal alignment, use of the cobalt chrome rod, accessory rod technique, or LLIF was shown to be effective for reducing RF in ASD surgery.

OBJECTIVEMaintaining lumbosacral (LS) arthrodesis and global sagittal balance after long fusion to the sacrum remains an important issue in the surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity (ASD). The importance and usefulness of LS fixation have been documented, but the optimal surgical long fusion to the sacrum remains a matter for debate. Therefore, the authors performed a retrospective study to evaluate fusion on CT scans and the risk factors for LS pseudarthrosis (nonunion) after long fusion to the sacrum in ASD.METHODSThe authors performed a retrospective study of 59 patients with lumbar degenerative kyphosis (mean age 69.6 years) who underwent surgical correction, including an interbody fusion of the L5–S1, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Achievement of LS fusion was evaluated by analyzing 3D-CT scans at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Patients were classified into a union group (n = 36) and nonunion group (n = 23). Risk factors for nonunion were analyzed, including patient and surgical factors.RESULTSThe overall fusion rate was 61% (36/59). Regarding radiological factors, optimal sagittal balance at the final follow-up significantly differed between two groups. There were no significant differences in terms of patient factors, and no significant differences with respect to the use of pedicle subtraction osteotomy, the number of fused segments, the proportion of anterior versus posterior interbody fusion, S2 alar iliac fixation versus conventional iliac fixation, or loosening of sacral or iliac screws. However, the proportion of metal cages to polyetheretherketone cages and the proportion of sacropelvic fixation were significantly higher in the union group (p = 0.022 and p < 0.05, respectively).CONCLUSIONSLS junction fusion is crucial for global sagittal balance, and the use of iliac screws in addition to LS interbody fusion using a metal cage improves the outcomes of long fusion surgery for ASD patients.

Objective: To analyze ideal indication for combined anterior column realignment (ACR) with short posterior spinal fusion (PSF) and posterior column osteotomy (PCO) for preventing proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with lower lumbar kyphosis and compensatory thoracolumbar lordosis. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted. This study included 27 ASD patients (average age of 66.6 years; one male and 26 females) with lower lumbar kyphosis and compensated thoracolumbar lordosis who underwent short PSF with PCO following ACR from 2006 to 2010. The minimum follow-up period was 5 years. The patients were divided into two groups based on the sagittal vertical axis (SVA) of the last follow-up radiographs, and a comparative analysis was performed evaluating spino-pelvic parameters and clinical outcomes including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and complications. Results: The mean follow-up time of included patients was 109.7 months, and the mean number of fused segments was 3.7. The uppermost instrumented vertebra was L 2 in 18 patients or L 3 in nine patients, and lowermost instrumented vertebra was sacrum in all patients. The mean lumbar lordosis (LL) values in the optimal SVA and suboptimal SVA groups were 4.4 and 4.2 preoperatively (P = 0.639), −48.1 and −35 postoperatively (P = 0.007), and −45.2 and −20.7 at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). Overcorrection was seen in seven patients in the optimal SVA group, whereas all of the patients of the suboptimal SVA group were in the category of undercorrection (P = 0.021). Pelvic incidence (PI) of optimal SVA group (<50 mm, n = 16) and suboptimal SVA group (≥50 mm, n = 11) was 44.1 and 53.8 (P = 0.009). The prevalence of PJK was significantly higher in the suboptimal SVA group (P = 0.008), and last follow-up VAS for back pain (P < 0.05), and postoperative and last follow-up ODI (P = 0.002 and P < 0.05) were statistically larger for the suboptimal group than the optimal group. Conclusions: Combined ACR with short PSF and PCO could effectively prevent sagittal decompensation of PJK and help achieve sagittal balance in the treatment of ASD patients with lower lumbar kyphosis, compensatory thoracolumbar lordosis, and especially low PI (<50).

A retrospective study.Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate optimal and ideal target values of the spine balance correction in elderly patients with adult spinal deformity who were over the age of 60 years. Summary of Background Data. The target values of the Scoliosis Research Society -Schwab classification to obtain satisfactory alignment and favorable outcomes are used in many spinal reconstruction surgeries. However, uniformly applying the Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab classification to all elderly patients aged 60 years or older showing sagittal malalignment may lead to several inconsistencies. Methods. This study included 121 patients (average age 70.5 yr and a minimum 2-yr follow-up) with adult spinal deformity who underwent long-segment fusion from T10 to sacrum. We used Pearson's correlation coefficient to analyze the relationship between clinical and radiographic parameters, and multilinear regression analysis and multivariate logistic regression model (backward elimination method) were conducted using the correlation factors of postoperative (Post) and last follow-up (Last) sagittal vertical axis to find the risk factors of Post sagittal imbalance.Results. Logistic regression analysis with the correlation factors of Post and Last sagittal vertical axis led to risk factors of Post sagittal imbalance, and after confirming the significance of each path, it was confirmed that the effects of pelvic incidence (PI)lumbar lordosis (LL) and Post pelvic tilt ratio (PTr) were valid (P < 0.05). After using ROC curve, target value of PI-LL was 1.33, and that of PTr was 25.95%. Conclusion. Through our study, the risk factors of Post sagittal imbalance were the Post value of PI-LL and that of PTr, and target value of PI-LL was <1.33 and that of PTr was <25.95%. These target values can be effective guidelines for spine surgeons who perform spine reconstruction surgeries for elderly patients with a pure sagittal imbalance based on Schwab's formula.

Background: In surgical correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD), pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) plays a key role to restore normal sagittal alignment. Recently, it has been found that postoperative lordosis morphology act as an important factor in preventing mechanical complications. However, there have been no studies on the effect of postoperative lordosis morphology on the restoration of sagittal alignment. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of postoperative lordosis morphology on achievement of optimal sagittal alignment. The secondary objective was to find out which radiographic or morphologic parameter affects sagittal alignment in surgical correction of ASD. Methods: 228 consecutive patients with lumbar degenerative kyphosis who underwent deformity correction and long-segment fixation from T10 to S1 with sacropelvic fixation and follow-up over 2 years were enrolled. Patients were divided according to whether optimal alignment was achieved (balanced group) or not (non-balanced group) at last follow-up. We analyzed the differences of postoperative radiographic parameters and morphologic parameters between two groups. Correlation analysis and stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed to predict the effect of PI-LL and morphologic parameters on the sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Results: Of 228 patients, 195 (85.5%) achieved optimal alignment at last follow-up. Two groups significantly differed in postoperative and last follow-up LL (p < 0.001 and p = 0.028, respectively) and postoperative and last follow-up PI-LL (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Morphologic parameters did not significantly differ between the two groups except lower lordosis arc angle (=postoperative sacral slope). In correlation analysis and stepwise multiple linear regression analysis, postoperative PI-LL was the only parameter which had significant association with last follow-up SVA (R2 = 0.134, p < 0.001). Morphologic parameters did not have any association with last follow-up SVA. Conclusions: When planning spine reconstruction surgery, although considering postoperative lordosis morphology is necessary, it is still very important considering proportional lordosis correction based on individual spinopelvic alignment (PI-LL) to achieve optimal sagittal alignment.