Background: Biomarkers of lymphomas identified by immunostaining of lymphoma tissues were recently found to have a prognostic value for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBL). Thus, it seems likely that the prognostic prediction of lymphomas might be improved by incorporating biological markers into well known prognostic systems. Methods: To determine the clinical significance of the biological markers expressed in DLBL, 26 patients, with de novo DLBL, were retrospectively studied at the Chungnam National University Hospital. Archival specimens from the patients were stained with antibodies for the bcl-2, bcl-6, Ki-67, CD 10, IRF-4, Granzyme-B, MHC-II and p16 antigens. Two immunophenotypic patterns of DLBL were identified by the pattern of differentiation; the germinal center (GC, CD10±/Bcl-6+/IRF-4-)-like subgroup and the post germinal center (pGC, CD10±/bcl-6±/IRF4+)-like subgroup. Results: The median age of the subjects was 56 years, ranging form 37 to 69. After a median follow up duration of 48 months, the median survival time was 44 month, ranging from 1~100 months. The five-year overall survival rate Using the Kaplan-Meier method was 32%. The only biomarker affecting the survival was bcl-2 (P=0.009). The survival of the GC-like subgroup was superior to that of the pGC-like subgroup, but without statistical significance (P=0.064). Among 18 patients with IPI scores 0~ 2, those expressing bcl-2 (P=0.002) and the pGC-like subgroup had a worse prognosis compared to the GC-like subgroup (P=0.049). Conclusion: The prognostic assessment of DLBL patients might be improved by the addition of immunohistochemical profiles, especially for bcl-2, to the traditional IPI system.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.