Background/Objective: To document the relationship between level of physical activity and quality of life in persons with spinal cord injury. Design: Cross-sectional investigation. Participants/Methods: Men (n ¼ 32) and women (n ¼ 30) with complete and incomplete spinal cord lesions below C6 volunteered to participate in this study. The average length of time since the onset of disability was 9 years (range, 1.5-40 years). Using an interview-formatted survey (Quality of Well-Being Scale), a measure of quality of life was obtained for each participant. Physical activity levels were determined using the Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities. Results: A strong positive association (r ¼ 0.75; P , 0.05) was observed between level of physical activity and quality of life. Multiple regression analysis also showed that when level of physical activity, anatomical location of the injury, completeness of injury, and time since injury were used as explanatory variables, level of physical activity was the only significant predictor of quality of life, accounting for 56% of the total variation in quality of life. Conclusions: Results from this study show that a significant and moderately strong positive relationship exists between level of physical activity and quality of life in adults with spinal cord injury. From a clinical perspective, these findings suggest that interventions aimed at promoting physical activity may be effective in improving quality of life in this population.
Abstract-We determined the number of days of step activity monitoring required to establish stable measures of walking activity in adults with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). Eleven individuals with iSCI (mean age 49 +/-14 years) wore a StepWatch Activity Monitor during waking hours for 7 consecutive days. We used generalizability theory to identify sources of variance in daily step counts and determine the minimum number of days necessary to obtain a reliability coefficient (G-coefficient) greater than or equal to 0.80. Average daily step activity (DSA) was 1,281 +/-1,594 steps. Participants and days accounted for 70.9% and 1.3% of total variance in DSA, respectively, while unidentifiable error accounted for 27.8% of the total variance in DSA. A minimum of 2 days was required to achieve a G-coefficient greater than or equal to 0.80. An acceptably stable measure of walking activity in adults with iSCI can be obtained by averaging step count values from any 2-day period in a week. Results from this investigation should be useful in evaluating the effect of activitybased programs designed to enhance locomotor function in persons with iSCI.
In unfamiliar and familiar walking conditions, the Centrios pedometer accurately monitors step-based activity in adults with VI when mounted at the hip opposite the user's MA.
We determined the number of days of step activity monitoring required to establish stable measures of walking activity in adults with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). Eleven individuals with iSCI (mean age 49 +/-14 years) wore a StepWatch Activity Monitor during waking hours for 7 consecutive days. We used generalizability theory to identify sources of variance in daily step counts and determine the minimum number of days necessary to obtain a reliability coefficient (G-coefficient) greater than or equal to 0.80. Average daily step activity (DSA) was 1,281 +/-1,594 steps. Participants and days accounted for 70.9% and 1.3% of total variance in DSA, respectively, while unidentifiable error accounted for 27.8% of the total variance in DSA. A minimum of 2 days was required to achieve a G-coefficient greater than or equal to 0.80. An acceptably stable measure of walking activity in adults with iSCI can be obtained by averaging step count values from any 2-day period in a week. Results from this investigation should be useful in evaluating the effect of activitybased programs designed to enhance locomotor function in persons with iSCI.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.