Introduction: The Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) assesses orthopaedic resident knowledge over 275 multiple-choice questions.Since the first publication examining the contents of the pathology section was published over ten years ago, the pathology content has been renamed (oncology) and revamped. As the overall extent of these alterations is currently unknown, the efficacy of current orthopaedic oncology educational practices for optimal OITE performance should be questioned. To determine how the oncology (pathology) material has changed, we compared the following characteristics from previous examinations (2002 to 2006) to current examinations (2012 to 2016): (1) What are the average number of oncology questions being asked? (2) What are the specific imaging modalities presented for examinee interpretation? (3) Which pathologic diagnoses are commonly examined? (4) What is the pattern of taxonomic question classifications? Methods: The 2012 to 2016 OITE study guides were reviewed, and each oncology question was categorized into one of the following: benign or malignant, imaging modality grouping, common pathologic diagnosis, question type, and taxonomic classification. The aforementioned information was extrapolated from the previous pathology publication published in 2010 to create the previous examination cohort (2002 to 2006). The current examination characteristics were then compared with those of the previous examinations. Results: The current number of oncology OITE questions significantly decreased from previous years (27.2 versus 21.2; P = 0.015). Current examinations displayed a significant increase in testing the interpretation of diagnostic imaging modalities compared with previous examinations (78.3% versus 55.8%; P < 0.001). The current examinations examined a wide spectrum of pathologic diagnoses, including previously untested pathologies. The number of taxonomy 1 questions on current examinations significantly decreased (36.8% versus 24.5%; P = 0.032), whereas the number of taxonomy 3 questions significantly increased from previous examinations (48.1% versus 32.4%; P = 0.032). Discussion: This study demonstrated that the nature of the orthopaedic oncology (pathology) section has changed over the past 10 years. Although the overall number of pathology-related questions decreased, the difficulty level of these questions increased, demanding a higher level of knowledge and critical thinking. A formal orthopaedic oncology rotation may be the best method to educate and improve OITE oncology performance. Level of Evidence: Prognostic study, level III
Category: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis; Arthroscopy; Bunion; Hindfoot; Lesser Toes; Midfoot/Forefoot; Sports; Trauma; Other Introduction/Purpose: With the increasing complexity of physician reimbursement models, understanding reimbursement trends is crucial to the financial sustainability of orthopaedic practices nationwide. Inflation-adjusted Medicare physician reimbursement for total joint arthroplasty has decreased by approximately 33% from 2000 to 2019. Recent trends in orthopaedic foot and ankle reimbursement are unknown. Thus, our study sought to analyze trends in Medicare reimbursement rates from 2000 to 2020 for common orthopaedic foot and ankle surgical procedures. Methods: The financial database of a single academic tertiary care center was queried to identify the CPT codes most frequently utilized in orthopaedic foot and ankle care. Next, the Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services was queried for the top 30 CPT codes utilized, and physician reimbursement data extracted. Monetary data was subsequently adjusted for inflation utilizing the consumer price index and reported in 2020 US dollars (USD). Average annual and the total percent change in reimbursement were calculated for included procedures. Results: After adjusting for inflation, the average physician reimbursement decreased by 31.6% for all included foot and ankle procedures from 2000 to 2020, with 23/30 codes decreasing by more than 30%. The greatest decrease in reimbursement observed from 2000 to 2020 was for open treatment of calcaneal fracture at 48.3% ($2,254.17 to $1,164.97), followed by flexor tendon repair at 48.2% ($741.02 to $357.39), and open treatment of pilon fracture at 43.9% ($2,451.37 to $1,076.36). Conclusion: Over the past two decades, physician reimbursement for foot and ankle procedures has dramatically decreased by up to 48.3%. Continued downward trends in orthopaedic foot and ankle physician reimbursement may lead to decreased access to quality foot and ankle care.
PFPS, we did demonstrate a significant reduction in pain after the application of Kinesio Tape. These results suggest other variables addressed by the Kinesio Tape may be causing the pain associated with PFPS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.