Laboratory and field experiments were conducted on the island of Hawaii from 1977—1980 in an effort to determine the impact of avian malaria on the forest birds. At 16 study sites from sea level to tree line in mesic and xeric habitat, birds were captured and bled to determine the host and altitudinal distribution of blood parasites. In the laboratory, six bird species were challenged with malarial parasites to measure host susceptibility. Distributions, activity cycles, and transmission potentials of malarial parasite vectors were also analyzed. One species of Plasmodium was present from sea level to tree line, concentrated in the mid—elevational ranges in the ecotonal area where vectors and native birds had the greatest overlap. Native forest birds were: (a) more susceptible to malaria than were introduced species; (b) most likely to have malaria during the nonbreeding, wet season; (c) found ranging lower in xeric than in mesic forests; and (d) found to have a lower prevalence of malaria in xeric forests. Temporal as well as elevational differences in prevalence and parasitemia levels of wild birds were apparent throughout the annual cycle, a result of differing host and parasite responses to biotic and abiotic factors. Avian malaria probably did not reach epizootic proportions on Hawaii until after ≈1920. However, since that time it has had a negative impact on the population dynamics of the native forest birds and is today a major limiting factor, restricting both abundance and distribution of these species on the island. In response, a number of native bird species have developed immunogenetic and behavioral responses that reduce the impact of the parasite on host populations.
We determined prevalence and altitudinal distribution of forest birds infected with avian pox at 16 locations on Hawaii, from sea level to tree line in mesic and xeric habitats, during 1977–1980. Isolates from lesions were cultured in the laboratory for positive identification of Poxvirus avium. Infected birds from the wild were brought into the laboratory to assess differences in the course of infection in native versus introduced species. We also documented distributions and activity cycles of potential avian pox vectors.>Native forest birds were (1) more susceptible to avian pox infection than were introduced species, (2) most likely to be infected during the wet season, and (3) found to have a higher prevalence in mesic when compared to xeric forests. Avian pox occurred in forest birds at all elevations, but highest levels were in the mid-elevational ranges (∼1,200 m) where vectors and native birds had the greatest overlap. Temporal and elevational differences in prevalence were apparent throughout the annual cycle. Avian pox probably did not reach epizootic proportions on Hawaii until after introduction of the mosquito and domestic birds in the early 1800s, and since then has had a negative effect on the population dynamics of native forest birds. Today, this introduced disease is an important factor that should be considered in future conservation efforts that are directed at the recovery of native forest birds in Hawaii.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.