No abstract

a b s t r a c tObjectives: The objectives of this study were to: (1) explore the proportion of HTx centers that have a multidisciplinary team and (2) assess the relationship between multidisciplinarity and the level of chronic illness management (CIM). Background: The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) recommends a multidisciplinary approach in heart transplant (HTx) follow-up care but little is known regarding the proportion of HTx centers that meet this recommendation and the impact on patient care. HTx centers

Innovative surgical and medical techniques have prolonged the life span of cardiothoracic (CT) transplant recipients and made transplantation an option for many older patients. Cognitive function is a key determinant of the CT transplant recipient's ability to manage the complex treatment regimen and experience optimum benefit of the procedure. As the CT population ages, risk of cognitive dysfunction due to normal aging is compounded by the physical and mental changes associated with end-stage organ disease, comorbid conditions, and transplant-related complications. Cognitive abilities consist of (a) receptive functions (ability to select, acquire, classify, and integrate information); (b) memory and learning (ability to store and retrieve information); (c) thinking (ability to mentally organize and reorganize information; and (d) expressive functions (ability to communicate or act upon information). Although each of these functions represents a distinct type of behavior, they are interdependent. The purpose of this article is to (a) discuss the literature regarding cognitive function before and after adult heart, lung, and heart-lung transplantation; (b) identify methodological problems associated with the studies done to date; and (c) make recommendations for future research in this area.

This study examined heart transplant candidates' perceived stressors and coping strategies at the time of placement on the waiting list and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months following. Mean stress scores were relatively low at each assessment time. The 4 greatest stressors were (1) having a terminal disease, (2) needing a heart transplant, (3) worrying family members, and (4) undergoing prolonged hospitalization. Total stress scores indicated that candidates were effectively using a moderate number of coping strategies, the 5 most frequently used ones being thinking positively, trying to keep life normal, keeping a sense of humor, praying or trusting in God, and trying to distract oneself. The 5 most effective coping mechanisms were thinking positively, keeping a sense of humor, thinking of good things, praying or trusting in God, and trying to keep life normal. No significant differences were seen in coping use or effectiveness over time.

No abstract