We conducted a population-based molecular epidemiological study of tuberculosis (TB) in Madrid, Spain (2002 to 2004), to define transmission patterns and factors associated with clustering. We particularly focused on examining how the increase in TB cases among immigrants in recent years (2.8% in 1997 to 1999 to 36.2% during the current study) was modifying transmission patterns. Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates obtained from patients living in nine districts of Madrid (1,459,232 inhabitants) were genotyped. The TB case rate among foreign-born people was three to four times that of Spanish-born people, and the median time from arrival to the onset of treatment was 22.4 months. During the study period, 227 (36.3%) patients were grouped in 64 clusters, and 115 (50.7%) of them were in 21 clusters with mixed Spanish-born and foreign-born patients. Three of the 21 mixed clusters accounted for 21.1% of clustered patients. Twenty-two of 38 (57.9%) immigrants in mixed clusters were infected with TB strains that had already been identified in the native population in 1997 to 1999, including the three most prevalent strains. Factors identified as independent predictors of clustering were homelessness (odds ratio [OR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.2 to 4.5; P ‫؍‬ 0.011) and to be born in Spain (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.6; P ‫؍‬ 0.002). The results indicated that (i) TB transmission was higher in Spanish-born people, associated mainly with homelessness, (ii) that foreign-born people were much less likely to be clustered, suggesting a higher percentage of infection before arriving in Spain, and (iii) that an extensive transmission between Spanish-and foreign-born populations, caused mainly by autochthonous strains, was taking place in Madrid.

Recent transmission among immigrants and transmission permeability between the immigrant and autochthonous populations were found. Epidemiologic strategies that combine universal genotyping and refined surveys of the clustered patients are needed to investigate transmission patterns in complex scenarios.

In recent years, the application of molecular tools has shown us that clonal complexity in infection byMycobacterium tuberculosis is not anecdotal. Exogenous reinfections, mixed infections, compartmentalization, and microevolution are different aspects of this issue. The detection and characterization of clonal variants of M. tuberculosis by standard genotyping methods is laborious and frequently requires expertise. Our aim was to evaluate a new genotyping PCR-based method for M. tuberculosis, mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unitvariable-number tandem repeat typing (MIRU-VNTR), as a potential tool to simplify and optimize the clonal analysis of tuberculosis. MIRU-VNTR was able to detect mixed clonal variants in vitro, even for clones at low ratios (1:99). This technique was prospectively applied to search for cases infected by more than one clone. Clonal variants within the same host were detected in 3 out of 115 cases (2.6%), including cases with clones which were indistinguishable by restriction fragment length polymorphism or spoligotyping. In one case, coinfecting clonal variants differed in antibiotic susceptibilities. MIRU-VNTR was applied to cases with proven polyclonal infection, and it succeeded in detecting the coinfecting strains and proved useful in confirming cases of compartmentalized infection. MIRU-VNTR is a simple, rapid, and sensitive method which could facilitate and optimize the identification and characterization of clonal complexity in M. tuberculosis infection.In recent years, clonal analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection has shown us that, in certain circumstances, tuberculosis is a much more complex situation than the schematic vision of one strain infecting one host. The complex situations found in tuberculosis include recurrences caused by exogenous reinfections (2,4,5,7,19); simultaneous coinfections by more than one M. tuberculosis strain (3,5,8,13,20); compartmentalization of the infection; with different strains infecting different tissues (3, 9, 12); and microevolution phenomena leading to the appearance of clonal variants within a host (6, 10). Unfortunately, the methodological approach to a search for clonal heterogenity or polyclonality is complex and/or laborious because it requires (i) a refined analysis of genotypic patterns to prove the existence of different clones or (ii) the analysis of multiple independent colonies from each specimen in order to detect the presence of clonal variants. These methodological exigencies have been responsible for the small number of reports examining this issue. Mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable-number tandem repeat typing (MIRU-VNTR) (17) is a novel PCR-based typing method for M. tuberculosis which is based on the amplification of 12 independent loci and the assignation of the number of tandem repeats found in each locus. The purpose of this study is to test the usefulness of this novel method for simplifying and optimizing the exploration and characterization of clonal complexity in tuberculosis. MATERIALS...

Laboratory cross-contamination by Mycobacterium tuberculosis is known to be responsible for the misdiagnosis of tuberculosis, but its impact on other contexts has not been analyzed. We present the findings of a molecular epidemiology analysis in which the recent transmission events identified by a genotyping reference center were overestimated as a result of unnoticed laboratory cross-contamination in the original diagnostic laboratories.The phenomenon of misdiagnosing tuberculosis by laboratory cross-contamination when Mycobacterium tuberculosis is cultured has been widely reported (3, 4-8, 10, 11). The production of aerosolized particles after the processing of smearpositive specimens, cultures positive for M. tuberculosis, or positive control strains may be responsible for the inoculation of other specimens processed on the same day or of reagents used for the decontamination of specimens (5). False positivity is suspected (i) if M. tuberculosis is cultured from a sample processed together with a smear-positive specimen, (ii) if M. tuberculosis is cultured from only one of the cultures in the set (usually with a low yield of bacteria), and (iii) if the clinician is considering an alternative diagnosis, that is, a diagnosis other than tuberculosis (TB). Suspicion of false positivity is increased when two or more of these conditions are met. Finally, if molecular analysis is available, cross-contamination is confirmed when the strains cultured from both truly infected and contaminated specimens share the same genotypic pattern and no epidemiological links can be found between the cases. Several studies, some of which are based on molecular analysis, have estimated that the rate of laboratory cross-contamination for M. tuberculosis ranges from 0.1% to 3%, although massive contamination has caused up to 65% of false-positive cases (11).False-positive results for tuberculosis have been a matter of concern because of the clinical, therapeutic, and social impacts of the misdiagnosis of tuberculosis. The economic load associated with each misdiagnosed case of tuberculosis has been estimated to be $32,618 (9). However, another area on which false positivity has an impact but which has received little attention is the misidentification of recent transmission events by molecular epidemiology studies. Molecular epidemiology is based on the analysis of the genotypes of cultured M. tuberculosis isolates to identify cases infected by the same M. tuberculosis strain. These cases are defined as clustered and are considered to be caused by recent transmission events and to belong to the same transmission chain. If an analysis to determine the existence of potential false-positive cases is not performed before molecular analysis, as a quality control of microbiological procedures, there is a risk of misassigning clustered cases. This refined preanalysis is not usually performed because molecular epidemiology studies are generally run by laboratories which are different from those which culture M. tuberculosis from clinical spec...

In recent years, the number of cases of tuberculosis (TB) among immigrants in Spain has increased markedly, and led to this analysis of the recent transmission patterns of TB in the immigrant population in Madrid. The countries from which the highest number of immigrant cases have been reported were Ecuador (21%), Romania (16%), Morocco (12%), Peru (11%) and Bolivia (9%). Fifty-one per cent of the cases were from South America. In a multicentre study (2004-2006), IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism and spoligotyping were used to genotype the Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from 632 immigrant cases from 47 countries. A total of 183 cases (29%) were grouped into 59 clusters, which are markers of potential transmission events. Most of the clusters (81%) included patients living in different healthcare districts, and 54% of the clusters were multinational. When a sample of 478 autochthonous cases was included, 53% of the clusters involving immigrants also included autochthonous cases. This study revealed marked transmission permeability among nationalities and between the immigrant and the autochthonous populations.