No abstract

Conventional 4DCBCT captures 1320 projections across 4 min. Adaptive 4DCBCT has been developed to reduce imaging dose and scan time. This study investigated reconstruction algorithms that best complement adaptive 4DCBCT acquisition for reducing imaging dose and scan time whilst maintaining or improving image quality compared to conventional 4DCBCT acquisition using real patient data from the first 10 adaptive 4DCBCT patients. Adaptive 4DCBCT was implemented in the ADaptive CT Acquisition for Personalized Thoracic imaging clinical trial. Adaptive 4DCBCT modulates gantry rotation speed and kV acquisition rate in response to the patient’s real-time respiratory signal, ensuring even angular spacing between projections at each respiratory phase. We examined the first 10 lung cancer radiotherapy patients that received adaptive 4DCBCT. Fast, 200-projection scans over 60–80 s, and slower, 600-projection scans over ∼240 s, were obtained after routine patient treatment and compared against conventional 4DCBCT acquisition. Adaptive 4DCBCT acquisitions were reconstructed using Feldkamp−Davis−Kress (FDK), McKinnon–Bates (MKB), Motion Compensated FDK (MCFDK) and Motion Compensated MKB (MCMKB) algorithms. Reconstructions were assessed via, Structural SIMilarity (SSIM), Signal-to-Noise-Ratio (SNR), Contrast-to-Noise-Ratio (CNR), Tissue Interface Sharpness of Diaphragm (TIS-D) and Tumor (TIS-T). The 200- and 600-projection adaptive 4DCBCT acquisition corresponded to 85% and 55% reduction in imaging dose, shorter and similar scan times of approximately 90 s and 236 s respectively, compared to conventional 4DCBCT acquisition. 200- and 600-projection adaptive 4DCBCT reconstructions achieved more than 0.900 SSIM relative to conventional 4DCBCT acquisition. Compared to conventional 4DCBCT acquisition, 200-projection adaptive 4DCBCT reconstructions achieved higher SNR, CNR, TIS-T, TIS-D with motion compensated algorithms, MCFDK (208%, 159%, 174%, 247%) and MCMKB (214%, 173%, 266%, 245%) respectively. The 200-projection adaptive 4DCBCT MCFDK- and MCMKB-reconstruction results show image quality improvements are possible even with 85% fewer projections acquired. We established acquisition-reconstruction protocols that provide substantial reductions in imaging time and dose whilst improving image quality.

No abstract

a b s t r a c tFifteen years of reported incidents were reviewed to provide insight into the effectiveness of an Incident Learning System (ISL). The actual error rate over the 15 years was 1.3 reported errors per 1000 treatment attendances. Incidents were reviewed using a Mann-Whitney U Test. The average number of incidents per year and the number of incidents per thousand attendances declined over time. Two seven-year periods were considered for analysis and the average for the first period (2005-2011) was 6 reported incidents per 1000 attendances compared to 2 incidents for the later period (2012-2018), p < 0.05. SAC 1 and SAC 2 errors have reduced over time and the reduction could be attributed to the quality assurance aspect of IGRT where the incident is identified prior to treatment delivery rather than after, reducing the severity of any potential incidents. The reasoning behind overall reduction in incident reporting over time is unclear but may be associated to quality and technology initiatives, issues with the ISL itself or a change in the staff reporting culture.Crown