SUMMARYBrain functioning is increasingly seen as a complex interplay of dynamic neural systems that rely on the integrity of structural and functional networks. Recent studies that have investigated functional and structural networks in epilepsy have revealed specific disruptions in connectivity and network topology and, consequently, have led to a shift from "focus" to "networks" in modern epilepsy research. Disruptions in these networks may be associated with cognitive and behavioral impairments often seen in patients with chronic epilepsy. In this review, we aim to provide an overview that would introduce the clinical neurologist and epileptologist to this new theoretical paradigm. We focus on the application of a theory, called "network analysis," to characterize resting-state functional and structural networks and discuss current and future clinical applications of network analysis in patients with epilepsy.

BackgroundSurgical innovation is different from the introduction of novel pharmaceuticals. To help address this, in 2009 the IDEAL Collaboration (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term follow-up) introduced the five-stage framework for surgical innovation. To evaluate the framework feasibility for novel neurosurgical procedure introduction, two innovative surgical procedures were examined: the endoscopic endonasal approach for skull base meningiomas (EEMS) and the WovenEndobridge (WEB device) for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.MethodsThe published literature on EEMS and WEB devices was systematically reviewed. Identified studies were classified according to the IDEAL framework stage. Next, studies were evaluated for possible categorization according to the IDEAL framework.ResultsFive hundred seventy-six papers describing EEMS were identified of which 26 papers were included. No prospective studies were identified, and no studies reported on ethical approval or patient informed consent for the innovative procedure. Therefore, no clinical studies could be categorized according to the IDEAL Framework. For WEB devices, 6229 articles were screened of which 21 were included. In contrast to EEMS, two studies were categorized as 2a and two as 2b.ConclusionThe results of this systematic review demonstrate that both EEMS and WEB devices were not introduced according to the (later developed in the case of EEMS) IDEAL framework. Elements of the framework such as informed consent, ethical approval, and rigorous outcomes reporting are important and could serve to improve the quality of neurosurgical research. Alternative study designs and the use of big data could be useful modifications of the IDEAL framework for innovation in neurosurgery.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00701-017-3280-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract

Managing internal carotid artery (ICA) injury during extended endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery is an extreme challenge. We aimed to find a possible surgical treatment strategy. We operated seven fresh, perfused cadaver heads with a transsphenoidal endoscopic approach of the ICA using a three-dimensional-high definition (3D-HD) endoscope. We made a paraclival ICA leak, which we tried to manage with clips and microsutures. Accurate transsphenoidal clip application on the ICA was impossible with standard aneurysm clips and applier. It was only feasible with a 9 mm slightly bended clip that could be opened from the inside and be applied with a dedicated flexible thin applier. Transsphenoidal suturing of an ICA leak was impossible from the ipsilateral nostril or with standard microinstruments. Suturing was only feasible from the contralateral nostril using flexible microinstruments with a thin 90-mm shaft. This was technically very challenging and involved a steep learning curve. Tamponade with muscle or fat and a quick transfer to the angiography suite for endovascular control remains the preferable option in case of an ICA leak during endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. If tamponade gives insufficient initial control, ICA clipping could be possible with dedicated instruments, with risk of increasing the defect, stenosis, or occlusion of the vessel. Transsphenoidal ICA suturing remains extremely difficult, and laboratory practice seems essential.

No abstract