Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease requiring lifelong medical attention. With hundreds of millions suffering worldwide, and a rapidly rising incidence, diabetes mellitus poses a great burden on healthcare systems. Recent studies investigating the underlying mechanisms involved in disease development in diabetes point to the role of the dys-regulation of the intestinal barrier. Via alterations in the intestinal permeability, intestinal barrier function becomes compromised whereby access of infectious agents and dietary antigens to mucosal immune elements is facilitated, which may eventually lead to immune reactions with damage to pancreatic beta cells and can lead to increased cytokine production with consequent insulin resistance. Understanding the factors regulating the intestinal barrier function will provide important insight into the interactions between luminal antigens and immune response elements. This review analyses recent advances in the mechanistic understanding of the role of the intestinal epithelial barrier function in the development of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Given our current knowledge, we may assume that reinforcing the intestinal barrier can offer and open new therapeutic horizons in the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
SUMMARY BackgroundMicroscopic colitis causes chronic watery diarrhoea. Recent studies have suggested an aetiological role for various medications, including proton pump inhibitors, in the pathogenesis of microscopic colitis.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with greater risk for colorectal cancer (CRC). The age of onset of T2DM is decreasing worldwide. An increased CRC risk in young T2DM patients could be relevant for the age at which to initiate CRC screening. We report on CRC risk in T2DM patients with attention to age of diagnosis. We used pharmacy data (from 1998 to 2010) from the PHARMO Database Network linked to the Eindhoven Cancer Registry. Multivariable time-dependent Cox regression analyses were conducted to calculate hazard ratios (HR) for developing CRC comparing T2DM with non-T2DM. During 2,599,925 years of follow-up, 394 CRC cases among 41,716 diabetes patients (mean age 64.0 yr, 48% men) and 1,939 CRC cases among 325,054 non-diabetic patients (mean age 51.2 yr, 46% men) were identified. Diabetes was associated with an increased CRC risk in both men and women (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2–1.5), particularly in the first 6 months after T2DM diagnosis and pronounced in the proximal colon. This risk was even higher in men younger than 55 years (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.0–3.8). T2DM was associated with a time-varying and subsite-specific increased CRC risk, which was even higher in men aged <55 years.
Previous studies on metformin use and gastrointestinal (GI) cancer risk have yielded inconclusive results on metformin's chemoprotective effects. We aimed to evaluate GI cancer risk in users of metformin in The Netherlands using a time-varying approach in a large population-based database. A cohort study was performed using the NCR-PHARMO database. Patients using ≥1 non-insulin antidiabetic drug (NIAD) during 1998 to 2011 were included ( = 57,621). Exposure to NIADs was modeled time-varyingly. Cox regression analysis estimated HRs of GI cancers in current metformin users versus current users of other NIADs. Covariables included age, sex, drugs known to impact cancer risk, history of hospitalization, and starting year of follow-up. A sensitivity analysis was performed, applying a new-user design. Current use of metformin was not associated with a decreased risk of GI cancer [HR, 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82-1.15] or specific GI cancer sites. The sensitivity analysis yielded comparable results. No decreasing trends were observed with increasing cumulative dose of metformin [HR 1.05, 95% CI, 0.85-1.28; HR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.73-1.10; HR 0.96, 95% CI, 0.77-1.19 for dose tertiles low (<405 g), medium (405-999 g), and high (≥999 g)]. In contrast, an increased risk of pancreatic cancer was found in current users of metformin plus insulin (HR, 4.90; 95% CI, 2.64-9.10). In conclusion, no decreased risk of GI cancer was found in current metformin users compared with current users of other NIADs. Variations in the exposure definition of metformin use may be one of the explanations of previously found reduced cancer risks in metformin users. .
Genetic variation in the insulin‐like growth factor (IGF) pathway may further increase the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Joint effects of T2DM and genetic variation in the IGF pathway on CRC risk can increase mechanistic insights. Participants from the Netherlands Cohort Study (n = 120, 852) completed a baseline questionnaire in 1986 when 55–69 years old (case–cohort, nsubcohort = 5,000, ncases = 3,441 after 16.3 years follow‐up). Self‐reported DM at baseline with onset at ≥30 years was classified as T2DM. Eighteen single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the IGF pathway were aggregated in a genetic risk score (GRS). Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) for CRC were estimated according to combinations of T2DM status with GRS tertiles and categories of an IGF1 19‐CA repeat polymorphism. Baseline T2DM prevalence was 3.1% in subcohort members and 3.8% in CRC cases. Comparison of combined categories with non‐T2DM individuals in the lowest GRS tertile as reference showed that those in the highest GRS tertiles with and without T2DM had significantly increased CRC risks, particularly those with T2DM (HR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.11, 4.66). As compared to IGF1 19‐CA wild‐type carriers without T2DM, carrying two IGF1 19‐CA variant repeat alleles were associated with a significantly decreased CRC risk in those without T2DM (HR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63–0.91). This association was absent when T2DM was present. Our study of joint effects indicated that the presence of unfavorable alleles in the IGF pathway may further increase the risk of CRC associated with T2DM.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.