Summary
Background
Accepted ‘standard practice’ for the diagnosis of immunobullous disease is a perilesional sample for direct immunofluorescence (DIF).
Objectives
To compare diagnostic outcomes of a normal buccal punch biopsy (NBPB) with a perilesional biopsy (PLB) for mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) and pemphigus vulgaris (PV).
Methods
A retrospective analysis of 251 DIF‐positive patients with MMP and 77 DIF‐positive patients with PV was undertaken. Parameters analysed included the intraoral sites of involvement and histopathological, DIF and indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) findings.
Results
For MMP, PLB was positive in 134 of 143 (93·7%) samples, compared with 129 of 144 (89·6%) by NBPB. The diagnostic sensitivities for PLB (81%, 39 of 48) and NBPB (77%, 37 of 48) among 48 patients who underwent both techniques were not significantly different (P = 0·62). In gingival‐only MMP, PLB was positive in 63 of 69 (91%) and NBPB was positive in 63 of 75 (84%). For multisite MMP, PLB was positive in 71 of 74 (96%) and NBPB was positive in 66 of 69 (96%). In gingival‐only MMP, biopsies from reflected alveolar mucosa in 17 consecutive patients were positive in 17 of 17 cases (100%). For PV, PLB was positive in 42 of 43 (98%), compared with 42 of 42 (100%) by NBPB. Histopathology was diagnostic in 93 of 134 (69·4%) cases of MMP and 38 of 41 (93%) cases of PV. IIF was positive in 126 of 197 (64·0%) MMP and 68 of 74 (92%) PV patient sera.
Conclusions
In the largest series of combined oral DIF results in patients with MMP and PV, we have shown that NBPB is equivalent to PLB for the diagnosis of PV and multisite MMP, and is more sensitive than both histology and IIF.
What's already known about this topic?
The variation in sensitivity of oral biopsy sites for direct immunofluorescence (DIF) in the diagnosis of oral MMP and PV has not been studied in detail in large series of patients.
Biopsy can be challenging due to difficult access and fragility of the oral mucosa. The diagnostic biopsy technique is therefore critical.
What does this study add?
We have shown that a normal buccal punch biopsy (NBPB) from uninvolved oral mucosa is as sensitive as a perilesional biopsy (PLB) for diagnosis of oral PV, and superior to serology and histology.
For multisite MMP, NBPB is equivalent to PLB and is more sensitive than serology and histology.
The oral punch biopsy technique on uninvolved buccal mucosa tissue is a simple and safe practical method for diagnosing oral PV and MMP.
Postoperative malignant hyperthermia (MH) is a very rare phenomena. It is generally observed within less than an hour after discontinuation of the anesthetic trigger. Present case describes rare delayed postoperative presentation of MH after off-pump coronary bypass surgery. Prompt recognition and immediate treatment with dantrolene can effectively treat the fatal syndrome. Family education and genetic counseling should be encouraged.
In the spectrum beam split approach of combined solar photovoltaic thermal system (PVT), the complete solar spectrum is splitted. The unwanted part of the solar spectrum for photovoltaic (PV) applications is filtered out and is used separately as heat. In this work, some inexpensive, clear, and easily available selective fluids are identified which can be used as both volumetric heat absorbers and selective spectrum filters for C-Si-based PVT. The electrical performance of a C-Si solar PV cell using these fluid-based filters is analyzed using a solar simulator at 1 Sun, AM 1.5 G. To check the volumetric heat absorbing potential, the required thermophysical properties of these selected fluids are estimated using a solar radiation pyranometer and standard experiments. The study concludes that water, coconut oil, and hydrotreated silicone transformer oil are some of the potential beam splitters and heat absorbers suitable for C-Si based spectrum beam split PVT applications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.