BackgroundThere is a paucity of data in the literature evaluating the performance of noncontrast MRI in the diagnosis of partial and complete tears of the proximal portion of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to arthroscopy for the diagnosis of pathology involving the intra-articular portion of the LHB tendon.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of 66 patients (mean age 57.8 years, range 43–70 years) who underwent shoulder arthroscopy and evaluation of the LHB tendon after having had a noncontrast MRI of the shoulder. Biceps pathology was classified by both MRI and direct arthroscopic visualization as either normal, partial tearing, or complete rupture, and arthroscopy was considered to be the gold standard. We then determined the sensitivity, specificity, and positive- and negative-predictive values of MRI for the detection of partial and complete LHB tears.ResultsMRI identified 29/66 (43.9%) of patients as having a pathologic lesion of the LHB tendon (19 partial and ten complete tears) while diagnostic arthroscopy identified tears in 59/66 patients (89.4%; 50 partial and 16 complete). The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for detecting partial tearing of the LHB were 27.7% and 84.2%, respectively (positive predictive value =81.2%, negative predictive value =32.0%). The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for complete tears of the LHB were 56.3% and 98.0%, respectively (positive predictive value =90.0%, negative predictive value =87.5%).ConclusionStandard noncontrast MRI of the shoulder is limited in detecting partial tears and complete ruptures of the intra-articular LHB tendon. Surgeons may encounter pathologic lesions of the LHB tendon during arthroscopy that are not visualized on preoperative MRI.
Fractures around the acromion are a known complication of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The literature provides limited data on the risk factors associated with this complication as well as the ultimate outcomes after nonoperative treatment. The goal of this study was to report clinical outcomes in patients with acromial fractures after nonoperatively treated reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The authors performed a retrospective review of 125 patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty that included several acromial stress fractures in the postoperative period. They prospectively compared radiographic data, including acromiohumeral distance, the presence of acromioclavicular joint arthritis, clinical measures of motion, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, in 2 groups based on the presence or absence of fracture in the postoperative period. Fourteen patients (11.2%) had an acromial fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty at an average of 5.1 months postoperatively. Patients who had fractures had worse postoperative forward elevation before fracture (116.6 vs 143.5; P=.02) and greater pain relief after reverse shoulder replacement, before fracture (P=.04). No significant difference was found between groups when the degree of arm lengthening was compared (27.6 vs 26.2 mm), and no difference was found in the prevalence of degenerative acromioclavicular joint changes identified preoperatively (66.4% vs 77.3%). After conservative management, most patients who had an acromial fracture returned to a functional level that was comparable to that achieved before fracture.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.