Numerous workers are exposed to vibrations which can turn out to be fatal for the health. Athletes can be included in this population, in particular cyclists who are exposed to vibration due to the irregularity of the road. This nuisance depends of the duration of exposure and the range of vibrations. While the worker is mostly directly excited by a vibrating system, the cyclist is indirectly subjected to it. He undergoes the vibrations of an excited sub-structure which is the bicycle. So the bicycle plays the role of a vibration filter or amplifier. In this paper we propose to (i) study the transmission of vibrations to the cyclist after excitation on a paving road, (ii) calculate the limit time of exposure to this type of excitation rate by the use of the standard ISO 5349 and the European directive 2002/44/EC, and (iii) compare the weighting curve of the standard with a vibrations transmissibility curve obtained between the collarbone and the stem. For this particular case of an excited sub-structure, a weighting curve is proposed by considering the first modal frequency of the bicycle.

This paper proposes to highlight two aspects of denoising in vibration analysis. The first aspect aims to reveal the singularities, and the second eliminates the noise in order to keep the useful signal. These two aspects are the cause of the surjection of denoising, especially due to the choice of the performance criteria. This paper highlights the use of denoising through these aspects, and then proposes a performance criterion suitable for vibration analysis as part of a noise suppression, to apply a processing method. This paper provides a reflection on the use of discrete wavelet transform through the various parameters which are used during processing.

The vibrations undergone by men are a well-known and widely studied risk factor in the industrial world. They are transmitted to the whole body or the upper limbs and they are measured, and limited, according to international standards. Disorders resulting from exposure to vibration are varied in nature: osteoarticular, muscular, vascular, and neurological. In this context, an European Directive 2002/44/EC to the protection of workers exposed to vibration, precises thresholds for vibration exposures and defines the procedure for risk prevention. Nevertheless, the effect of vibration is little studied in sports despite the ubiquity of these. Vibration can induce discomfort, degrading performance or causing musculoskeletal disorders. This paper makes an overview of the studies involving the vibrations during cycling. At first, this paper will summarize the different standards and guidelines relating vibration in humans, which present a guide for the measurement and evaluation of the vibration and exposure limits. Secondly, this paper presents a state of the art vibration effects: (i) the physiological and pathological disorders in athletes, (ii) and the performance. A third part will be devoted to the synthesis of numerical studies that represent the biodynamic response and help to predict the effects of human body vibration. Finally, new research and innovations will be discussed based on studies in other sports.

The aim of this study was to test the validity and the reliability of the G-Cog which is a new BMX powermeter allowing for the measurements of the acceleration on X-Y-Z axis (250 Hz) at the BMX rear wheel. These measurements allow computing lateral, angular, linear acceleration, angular, linear velocity and the distance. Mechanical measurements at submaximal intensities in standardized laboratory conditions and during maximal exercises in the field conditions were performed to analyse the reliability of the G-Cog accelerometers. The performances were evaluated in comparison with an industrial accelerometer and with 2 powermeters, the SRM and PowerTap. Our results in laboratory conditions show that the G-Cog measurements have low value of variation coefficient (CV=2.35%). These results suggest that the G-cog accelerometers measurements are reproducible. The ratio limits of agreement of the rear hub angular velocity differences between the SRM and the G-Cog were 1.010 × ÷ 1.024 (95%CI=0.986-1.034) and between PowerTap and G-Cog were 0.993 × ÷ 1.019 (95%CI=0.974-1.012). In conclusion, our results suggest that the G-Cog angular velocity measurements are valid and reliable compared with SRM and PowerTap and could be used to analyse the kinematics during BMX actual conditions.