Abstract. Low-cost particulate matter (PM) sensors have been under investigation as it has been hypothesized that the use of low-cost and easy-to-use sensors could allow cost-efficient extension of the currently sparse measurement coverage. While the majority of the existing literature highlights that low-cost sensors can indeed be a valuable addition to the list of commonly used measurement tools, it often reiterates that the risk of sensor misuse is still high and that the data obtained from the sensors are only representative of the specific site and its ambient conditions. This implies that there are underlying reasons for inaccuracies in sensor measurements that have yet to be characterized. The objective of this study is to investigate the particle-size selectivity of low-cost sensors. Evaluated sensors were Plantower PMS5003, Nova SDS011, Sensirion SPS30, Sharp GP2Y1010AU0F, Shinyei PPD42NS, and Omron B5W-LD0101. The investigation of size selectivity was carried out in the laboratory using a novel reference aerosol generation system capable of steadily producing monodisperse particles of different sizes (from ∼0.55 to 8.4 µm) on-line. The results of the study show that none of the low-cost sensors adhered to the detection ranges declared by the manufacturers; moreover, cursory comparison to a mid-cost aerosol size spectrometer (Grimm 1.108, 2020) indicates that the sensors can only achieve independent responses for one or two size bins, whereas the spectrometer can sufficiently characterize particles with 15 different size bins. These observations provide insight into and evidence of the notion that particle-size selectivity has an essential role in the analysis of the sources of errors in sensors.
The significance of air pollution and the problems associated with it are fueling deployments of air quality monitoring stations worldwide. The most common approach for air quality monitoring is to rely on environmental monitoring stations, which unfortunately are very expensive both to acquire and to maintain. Hence, environmental monitoring stations are typically sparsely deployed, resulting in limited spatial resolution for measurements. Recently, low-cost air quality sensors have emerged as an alternative that can improve the granularity of monitoring. The use of low-cost air quality sensors, however, presents several challenges: They suffer from cross-sensitivities between different ambient pollutants; they can be affected by external factors, such as traffic, weather changes, and human behavior; and their accuracy degrades over time. Periodic re-calibration can improve the accuracy of low-cost sensors, particularly with machine-learning-based calibration, which has shown great promise due to its capability to calibrate sensors in-field. In this article, we survey the rapidly growing research landscape of low-cost sensor technologies for air quality monitoring and their calibration using machine learning techniques. We also identify open research challenges and present directions for future research.
Air pollution is a major problem in urban areas, where high population density is accompanied with excess anthropomorphic emissions impacting the environment and increasing health effects. Highly accurate air quality monitoring stations have been used to monitor the severity of the problem and warn citizens. However, air quality can vary sharply even within the same city block, and pollution exposure can vary even 30% between individuals living in the same residence. Therefore, a dense deployment of air quality sensors is needed to detect these variations, and protect citizens from overexposure. Low-cost air quality sensors make it possible to densely instrument a city and detect hot spots as they happen. However, thus far limited information exists on their accuracy and practicability. In this paper, we conduct a 44 day measurement campaign to assess performance of low-cost air quality monitors under different environmental conditions. As practical use case we consider pollution hot spot detection. Our results show that the mean error of low-cost sensors is small, but the variation in error is significantly larger than with reference sensors. We also show that the accuracy is sufficient for applications relying on variations in air quality index values, such as hotspot detection.
Air pollution is a contributor to approximately one in every nine deaths annually. To counteract health issues resulting from air pollution, air quality monitoring is being carried out extensively in urban environments. Currently, however, city air quality monitoring stations are expensive to maintain, resulting in sparse coverage. In this paper, we introduce the design and development of the MegaSense Cyber-Physical System (CPS) for spatially distributed IoT-based monitoring of urban air quality. MegaSense is able to produce aggregated, privacyaware maps and history graphs of collected pollution data. It provides a feedback loop in the form of personal outdoor and indoor air pollution exposure information, allowing citizens to take measures to avoid future exposure. We present a batterypowered, portable low-cost air quality sensor design for sampling PM2.5 and air pollutant gases in different micro-environments. We validate the approach with a use case in Helsinki, deploying MegaSense with citizens carrying low-maintenance portable sensors, and using smart phone exposure apps. We demonstrate daily air pollution exposure profiles and the air pollution hotspot profile of a district. Our contributions have applications in policy intervention management mechanisms and design of clean air routing and healthier navigation applications to reduce pollution exposure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.