Purpose Nearly half of intensive care unit (ICU) patients will develop delirium. Antipsychotics are used routinely for the management of ICU delirium despite limited reliable data supporting this approach. The unwarranted continuation of antipsychotics initiated for ICU delirium is an emerging transitions of care concern, especially considering the adverse event profile of these agents. We sought to evaluate the magnitude of this issue across 6 centers in New Jersey and describe risk factors for continuation. Methods This multicenter, retrospective study examined adult ICU patients who developed ICU delirium from June 2016 to June 2018. Patients were included in the study if they received at least 3 doses of antipsychotics while in the ICU with presence of either a clinical diagnosis of delirium or a positive Confusion Assessment Method score. Patients were excluded if they were on an antipsychotic before ICU admission. Results Of the 300 patients included and initiated on antipsychotics for ICU delirium, 157 (52.3%) were continued on therapy upon transfer from the ICU to another level of inpatient care. The number of patients continued on newly initiated antipsychotics further increased to 183 (61%) upon discharge from the hospital. Conclusion The continuation of antipsychotics for the management of delirium during transitions of care was a common practice across ICUs in New Jersey. Several risk factors for continuation of antipsychotics were identified. Efforts to reduce unnecessary continuation of antipsychotics at transitions of care are warranted.

Background and Aims: The incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer is persistently highest in Black/African-Americans in the United States. While access to care, barriers to screening, and poverty might explain these findings, there is increased interest in examining biological factors that impact the colonic environment. Our group is examining biologic factors that contribute to disparities in development of adenomas prospectively. In preparation for this and to characterize a potential patient population, we conducted a retrospective review of initial screening colonoscopies in a cohort of patients. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on initial average risk screening colonoscopies on patients (age 45-75 years) during 2012 at three institutions. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between potential risk factors and the detection of adenomas. Results: Of the 2225 initial screening colonoscopies 1495 (67.2%) were performed on Black/African-Americans and 566 (25.4%) on Caucasians. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that older age, male sex, current smoking and teaching gastroenterologists were associated with higher detection of adenomas and these were less prevalent among Black/African-Americas except for age. Neither race, ethnicity, BMI, diabetes mellitus, HIV nor insurance were associated with adenoma detection. Conclusion: In this sample, there was no association between race and adenoma detection. While this may be due to a lower prevalence of risk factors for adenomas in this sample, our findings were confounded by a lower detection rate by consultant gastroenterologists at one institution. The study allowed us to rectify the problem and characterize patients for future trials.

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) are major causes of morbidity and mortality and have overlapping symptomatology including cough and dyspnea. Whether COPD is a risk factor for LVDD remains largely unclear. The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine if the prevalence of the LVDD as determined by echocardiographic parameters is increased in COPD patients. Methods: We used a time-and-language-restricted search strategy resulting in identification of 4,912 studies of which 15 studies met our apriori inclusion criteria; 4,897 were excluded, such duplicates, foreign language articles were excluded. We performed a meta-analysis of standard echo parameters on the fifteen case control studies related to diastolic dysfunction. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager, version 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration). Results: A total of 15 studies with 1,403 subjects were included. There were no differences in left ventricular ejection fraction between COPD and non-COPD population. Patients with COPD had prolonged isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT) (mean difference 20.84 [95% CI 12.21, 29.47]; P< 0.00001), lower E/A ratio (mean difference - 0.24 [95% CI −0.34, 00.14]; P < 0.00001), higher transmitral A wave peak velocity (Apv) (mean difference 11.71 [95% CI 4.80, 18.62]; P< 0.00001), higher E/e’ ratio (mean difference 1.88 [95% CI 1.23, 2.53]; P< 0.00001), lower mitral E wave peak velocity (Epv) (mean difference −8.74 [95% CI −13.63, −3.85]; P< 0.0005), prolonged deceleration time (DT) (mean difference 50.24 [95% CI 15.60, 84,89]; P< 0.004), a higher right ventricular end diastolic diameter (RVEDD) (mean difference 8.02 [95% CI 3.45, 12.60]; P< 0.0006) compared to controls. COPD patients had a higher pulmonary arterial pressure (mean difference 10.52 [95% CI 3.98, 17.05]; P< 0.002). Differences in septal e’ velocity (mean difference −2.69 [95% CI −6.07, 0.69]; P< 0.12) and in lateral e’ velocity (mean difference −2.84 [95% CI 5.91, 0.24]; P< 0.07) trended towards significance but did not meet our cutoff for statistical significance (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Patients with COPD are more likely to have LVDD as established by echocardiographic parameters. Our findings are likely explainable, in part, by factors such as lung hyperinflation, chronic hypoxia, hypercapnia, systemic inflammation, increased arterial stiffness, subendocardial ischemia, as well as ventricular interdependence; all of which might contribute to the pathogenesis of diastolic dysfunction. Further research is needed to elucidate the pathophysiologic mechanisms of increased LVDD in the COPD population with the potential impact on developing effective therapeutic interventions for these serious disorders.

Since then, six additional PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors have received FDA approval for various indications, including solid tumors, lymphomas, and tumors defi cient in DNA mismatch repair mechanisms. Although the advent of ICIs was a breakthrough in cancer therapy, these drugs can cause unique adverse reactions, which may be life-threatening. ICI toxicities generally involve the immune system, and these toxicities are referred to as immune-related adverse events. The most frequently involved organs are the skin, colon, endocrine organs, liver, and lungs. More serious adverse reactions may affect the neurologic and cardiovascular systems. 3,4 With the increasing use of ICIs, clinicians should be knowledgeable about these adverse reactions, which are graded from 1 (mild) to 4 (life-threatening). This article describes the clinical presentation and management of ICI-induced adverse reactions (Table 1). DERMATOLOGIC TOXICITYDermatologic toxicities are the most prevalent and often the earliest adverse reaction, and are reported in 30% to 50% of patients treated with ICIs. 5 These toxicities occur