Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, and total cholesterol are heritable, modifiable, risk factors for coronary artery disease. To identify new loci and refine known loci influencing these lipids, we examined 188,578 individuals using genome-wide and custom genotyping arrays. We identify and annotate 157 loci associated with lipid levels at P < 5×10−8, including 62 loci not previously associated with lipid levels in humans. Using dense genotyping in individuals of European, East Asian, South Asian, and African ancestry, we narrow association signals in 12 loci. We find that loci associated with blood lipids are often associated with cardiovascular and metabolic traits including coronary artery disease, type 2 diabetes, blood pressure, waist-hip ratio, and body mass index. Our results illustrate the value of genetic data from individuals of diverse ancestries and provide insights into biological mechanisms regulating blood lipids to guide future genetic, biological, and therapeutic research.

Background Whether vitamin D supplementation reduces cancer or cardiovascular disease remains unclear, and randomized trial evidence is limited. Methods The VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL) was a nationwide, randomized, placebo-controlled, 2X2 factorial trial of vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol, 2000 IU/day) and marine omega-3 fatty acids (1 g/day) for the prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease. There were 25,871 U.S. men aged ≥50 and women aged ≥55, including 5,106 African Americans, who participated. Primary endpoints were total invasive cancer and major cardiovascular events (composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality). Secondary endpoints included site-specific cancers, cancer mortality, and additional cardiovascular events. Results Vitamin D supplementation did not reduce either of the primary endpoints. During a median 5.3 year intervention, 1,617 participants were diagnosed with cancer (793 assigned to vitamin D and 824 assigned placebo; hazard ratio [HR]=0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.88–1.06; p-value=0.47); and 805 experienced a major cardiovascular event (396 assigned to vitamin D and 409 assigned to placebo; HR=0.97 [0.85–1.12]; p-value=0.69). For secondary endpoints, the hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals comparing Vitamin D to placebo were: cancer deaths (n=341, HR 0.83 (0.67–1.02); breast cancer (1.02; 0.79–1.31); prostate cancer 0.88 (0.72–1.07); colorectal cancer 1.09 (0.73–1.62); expanded cardiovascular disease events 0.96 (0.86–1.08); myocardial infarction 0.96 (0.78–1.19); stroke 0.95 (0.76–1.20); and cardiovascular mortality 1.11 (0.88–1.40). The HR for all-cause deaths (n=978) was 0.99 (0.87–1.12). No excess risks of hypercalcemia or other adverse events were identified. Conclusion Vitamin D supplementation did not reduce invasive cancer incidence or cardiovascular events.

N CONTRAST TO TOTAL CHOLESterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and highdensity lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), which are well-established independent risk factors for cardiovascular disease, 1 the importance of triglycerides remains controversial. In part this controversy reflects the fact that, due to the inverse correlation of triglyceride levels with those of HDL-C, adjustment for HDL-C attenuates the relationship between triglycerides and cardiovascular disease. A recent metaanalysis suggested that the adjusted risk ratio for coronary heart disease among individuals in the highest third of triglyceride levels compared with those in the lowest third decreases from approximately 2.0 to 1.5 after accounting for HDL-C levels. 2 A second aspect of the controversy stems from the manner in which triglyceride levels are typically measured. Current national guidelines recommend that blood for lipid profiles be drawn after an 8-to 12-hour fast. 1 Because plasma triglyceride levels can increase substantially postprandially, fasting levels ostensibly avoid the variability associated with meals and provide a See also pp 299 and 336.

Triglycerides are transported in plasma by specific triglyceride-rich lipoproteins; in epidemiologic studies, increased triglyceride levels correlate with higher risk for coronary artery disease (CAD). However, it is unclear whether this association reflects causal processes. We used 185 common variants recently mapped for plasma lipids (P<5×10−8 for each) to examine the role of triglycerides on risk for CAD. First, we highlight loci associated with both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglycerides, and show that the direction and magnitude of both are factors in determining CAD risk. Second, we consider loci with only a strong magnitude of association with triglycerides and show that these loci are also associated with CAD. Finally, in a model accounting for effects on LDL-C and/or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, a polymorphism's strength of effect on triglycerides is correlated with the magnitude of its effect on CAD risk. These results suggest that triglyceride-rich lipoproteins causally influence risk for CAD.

Background-Higher levels of physical activity are associated with fewer cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. Although the precise mechanisms underlying this inverse association are unclear, differences in several cardiovascular risk factors may mediate this effect. Methods and Results-In a prospective study of 27 055 apparently healthy women, we measured baseline levels of hemoglobin A1c, traditional lipids (total, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol), novel lipids [lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein A1 and B-100], creatinine, homocysteine, and inflammatory/hemostatic biomarkers (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, soluble intracellular adhesion molecule-1) and used women's selfreported physical activity, weight, height, hypertension, and diabetes. Mean follow-up was 10.9Ϯ1.6 years, and 979 incident CVD events occurred. The risk of CVD decreased linearly with higher levels of activity (P for linear trend Ͻ0.001). Using the reference group of Ͻ200 kcal/wk of activity yielded age-and treatment-adjusted relative risk reductions associated with 200 to 599, 600 to 1499, and Ն1500 kcal/wk of 27%, 32%, and 41%, respectively. Differences in known risk factors explained a large proportion (59.0%) of the observed inverse association. When sets of risk factors were examined, inflammatory/hemostatic biomarkers made the largest contribution to lower risk (32.6%), followed by blood pressure (27.1%). Novel lipids contributed less to CVD risk reduction compared with traditional lipids (15.5% and 19.1%, respectively). Smaller contributions were attributed to body mass index (10.1%) and hemoglobin A1c/diabetes (8.9%), whereas homocysteine and creatinine had negligible effects (Ͻ1%). Conclusions-The inverse association between physical activity and CVD risk is mediated in substantial part by known risk factors, particularly inflammatory/hemostatic factors and blood pressure.

Background Whether omega-3 fatty acid supplementation reduces risk of cardiovascular disease or cancer remains unclear. Methods The VITamin D and OmegA-3Trial (VITAL) was a randomized, placebo-controlled, 2X2 factorial trial of vitamin D3 (2000IU/day) and marine omega-3 fatty acids (1 g/day) in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer among 25,871 U.S. men aged ≥50 and women aged >55, including 5,106 African Americans. Primary endpoints were major cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality) and total invasive cancer. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the cardiovascular composite, the composite plus coronary revascularization, site-specific cancers, and cancer mortality. This paper reports the results of omega-3 and placebo. Results During a median 5.3 years, rates of the primary outcomes did not differ between the omega-3 and placebo groups -- 805 participants had a major cardiovascular event, hazard ratio [HR]= 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80–1.06, p= 0.24. Invasive cancer was diagnosed in 1,617 participants, HR 1.03 (0.93-1.13, p=0.56). In the analysis of key secondary endpoints, hazard ratios and 95% CIs comparing omega-3 to placebo were: expanded cardiovascular events, HR 0.93 (0.82-1.04); total myocardial infarction HR 0.72 (0.59-0.90); total stroke, HR 1.04 (0.83-1.31); cardiovascular mortality HR 0.96 (0.76-1.21); and cancer deaths (n=341, HR 0.97 (0.79-1.20). For all-cause mortality (n=978), the HR was 1.02 (0.90-1.15). No excess risks of bleeding or other serious adverse events were observed. Conclusions Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation did not reduce major cardiovascular events or cancer incidence.

Ruth Loos and colleagues report findings from a meta-analysis of multiple studies examining the extent to which physical activity attenuates effects of a specific gene variant, FTO, on obesity in adults and children. They report a fairly substantial attenuation by physical activity on the effects of this genetic variant on the risk of obesity in adults.

AimsTo critically evaluate the clinical implications of the use of non-fasting rather than fasting lipid profiles and to provide guidance for the laboratory reporting of abnormal non-fasting or fasting lipid profiles.Methods and resultsExtensive observational data, in which random non-fasting lipid profiles have been compared with those determined under fasting conditions, indicate that the maximal mean changes at 1–6 h after habitual meals are not clinically significant [+0.3 mmol/L (26 mg/dL) for triglycerides; −0.2 mmol/L (8 mg/dL) for total cholesterol; −0.2 mmol/L (8 mg/dL) for LDL cholesterol; +0.2 mmol/L (8 mg/dL) for calculated remnant cholesterol; −0.2 mmol/L (8 mg/dL) for calculated non-HDL cholesterol]; concentrations of HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein(a) are not affected by fasting/non-fasting status. In addition, non-fasting and fasting concentrations vary similarly over time and are comparable in the prediction of cardiovascular disease. To improve patient compliance with lipid testing, we therefore recommend the routine use of non-fasting lipid profiles, while fasting sampling may be considered when non-fasting triglycerides >5 mmol/L (440 mg/dL). For non-fasting samples, laboratory reports should flag abnormal concentrations as triglycerides ≥2 mmol/L (175 mg/dL), total cholesterol ≥5 mmol/L (190 mg/dL), LDL cholesterol ≥3 mmol/L (115 mg/dL), calculated remnant cholesterol ≥0.9 mmol/L (35 mg/dL), calculated non-HDL cholesterol ≥3.9 mmol/L (150 mg/dL), HDL cholesterol ≤1 mmol/L (40 mg/dL), apolipoprotein A1 ≤1.25 g/L (125 mg/dL), apolipoprotein B ≥1.0 g/L (100 mg/dL), and lipoprotein(a) ≥50 mg/dL (80th percentile); for fasting samples, abnormal concentrations correspond to triglycerides ≥1.7 mmol/L (150 mg/dL). Life-threatening concentrations require separate referral when triglycerides >10 mmol/L (880 mg/dL) for the risk of pancreatitis, LDL cholesterol >13 mmol/L (500 mg/dL) for homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia, LDL cholesterol >5 mmol/L (190 mg/dL) for heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia, and lipoprotein(a) >150 mg/dL (99th percentile) for very high cardiovascular risk.ConclusionWe recommend that non-fasting blood samples be routinely used for the assessment of plasma lipid profiles. Laboratory reports should flag abnormal values on the basis of desirable concentration cut-points. Non-fasting and fasting measurements should be complementary but not mutually exclusive.