No abstract

Drawing on complementary theoretical perspectives, we investigate whether and to what extent family-influenced firms differ from their nonfamily counterparts in terms of the relationship between managerial attention to natural environmental issues and concomitant environmental actions. Using data from letters to shareholders and the KLD database, we investigate 97 firms in five polluting industries. Our findings indicate that family firms positively moderate the relationship between top managers’ attention to natural environmental issues and proactive environmental action. Conversely, nonfamily firms demonstrate less proactive environmental action as their attention to environmental issues increases, suggesting greenwashing. We argue that attention and action behaviors in family firms are intimately connected with their desire to preserve socioemotional wealth and indicate a lower propensity to greenwash, whereas nonfamily firms’ short-term financial objectives may motivate a different response pattern.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

It is widely assumed in adversarial legal systems that cross-examination is the most effective method to ascertain the truth. However, a growing body of literature demonstrates the efficacy of cross-examination can be negatively impacted by individual differences such as age, and case factors including the delay between witnessing the event in question and testifying at trial. Moreover, the process of cross-examination can be a distressing experience for young witnesses. The introduction of ‘Section 28’ pre-trial cross-examination in courts throughout England and Wales is an attempt to improve the experiences and evidence quality of young witnesses in light of these concerns. This paper presents the views of seven police officers and six charity workers (commissioned through the local Police and Crime Commissioner to provide emotional support to young people affected by crime) who were interviewed prior to the national implementation of the Section 28 scheme for pre-trial cross-examination. It remains the only work that draws on insights from those from the charitable sector who support young witnesses through trial. It also provides more recent insights from police officers on their perspectives of the, then prospective, scheme. Two superordinate themes were identified: (a) the need for careful application, and (b) the impact of Section 28 on defendants. The findings are discussed considering the current literature, and context of the implementation of Section 28 since the study was conducted. Limitations of the research and suggestions for future practice are discussed.

No abstract