No abstract

Background: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) remain an important preventable healthcare-associated infection with a 2020 rate of 0.87 (per 1,000 central line days) in the United States intensive care units (ICU).Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all adult patients in our institution. The total number of central venous catheter (CVC) insertions and line days were determined using daily unit logs maintained by unit managers. Central line insertion practice (CLIP) compliance was calculated as the total number of CLIP forms submitted divided by the total number of newly-inserted CVCs with and without associated CLIP forms as determined by unit logs.Results: A total of 1,125 CVCs were reviewed (448 -ICU and 677 -medical-surgical units). Of the 13 CLABSI, one patient had internal jugular (IJ), one patient had subclavian (SC), four patients had femoral, three patients had peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) and four patients had hemodialysis catheters. Patients with CLABSI had CVC inserted for a range of five to 92 days with the average number of line days being 29 days. Conclusion:Based on the analysis of our CLABSI patient population, we recommend our institution implement the following criteria to decrease the prevalence of CLABSI: All patients receiving a CVC must adhere to CLIP documentation in all units, any femoral or HD CVC placed without a CLIP form should have the line changed within 48 hours, those patients with a femoral CVC or hemodialysis catheter in place for four days or greater with an abnormal WBC (<4.0 or >11 mg/dL) or abnormal temperature (<97.0F or >100.4F) should be considered for catheter exchange, and those patients with an IJ, SC, or PICC CVC in place for seven days or greater with an abnormal WBC or abnormal temperature should have the catheter changed.

Context: Opioids may be prescribed for the short-term management of acute-onset back pain in the setting of trauma or for long-term management of chronic back pain. More than 50% of regular opioid users report taking them for back pain. Objective: To investigate whether surgical intervention reduces opioid requirements by patients taking opioids for back pain and whether there is a difference between county and managed care hospitals in this postoperative reduction of opioid requirement. Methods: A retrospective medical record review of 118 patients who underwent elective lumbar fusion at 4 hospitals (2 county hospitals and 2 managed care hospitals) was conducted. Opioid requirements before and after surgical intervention and at the 30-day outpatient follow-up were evaluated. Results: Forty medical records were included in the study. An overall decrease in opioid use was found in the postoperative follow-up phase after lumbar fusion in both the county and managed care hospitals. This reduction was statistically significant at 3 of 4 hospitals (P<0.01). When the data were pooled by facility type, the significance remained for county facilities (P<.01) but not managed care facilities (P=.18). Moreover, there was a significant decrease in opioid use during the postoperative inpatient phase for county compared with managed care facilities (P=.0427). The pain rating reported by patients during the hospital stay was significantly higher at county compared with managed care hospitals (P=.0088); however, the difference at discharge was not significant (P=.14). Conclusion: Our study indicates that lumbar fusion is associated with a significant decrease in opioid use (P<.05) compared with nonsurgical management. Overall, the difference in decreased opioid use between county and managed care hospitals after lumbar fusion was not significant.