TPS5605 Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is associated with improved perioperative safety outcomes, but, in 2018, the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial, a non-inferiority study comparing laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer, reported significantly worse disease-specific (DSS) and overall survival (OS) in the MIS group. Criticisms of the LACC trial include lack of proper preoperative imaging and assessment, use of transcervical uterine manipulators, and lack of proper tumor containment leading to peritoneal contamination. Subsequent retrospective studies have reported conflicting results. Given the potential benefit of MIS, the ROCC trial seeks to address the limitations of the LACC trial. Methods: ROCC is a multi-center, prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial. The primary objective is to determine whether robotic-assisted (RBT) radical hysterectomy is not inferior to abdominal (OPEN) approach with respect to 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary objectives include DSS, OS, patterns of recurrence, peri- and postoperative complications, long-term morbidity, impact on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and development of lower extremity lymphedema (LEL). Key inclusion criteria include patients with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, squamous cell, and adenosquamous cell carcinoma of FIGO 2018 stage IA2-IB2. All patients must have a preoperative pelvic MRI confirming that the cervical tumor is < 4 cm in size, no obvious evidence of extracervical extension and no nodal or other regional metastasis. Intraoperatively, the use of transcervical uterine manipulators is not allowed and specific detailed surgical techniques for proper tumor containment is required. Photographic evidence of specimen with tumor contained is mandated. We estimate the 3-year DFS to be 92% in the control (OPEN) arm. If the DFS does not differ by more than 7% and the one-sided 95% CI does not cross the non-inferiority boundary, then the RBT arm will be deemed non-inferior. 840 patients will be enrolled (420 per arm, 89 events total), which provides 90% power to exclude an absolute decrease in DFS by 7% (HR < = 1.375) with a log-rank test for non-inferiority with a one-sided alpha of 0.05. The primary analysis will be conducted in all randomized patients (ITT). Given the LACC findings of worse oncologic outcomes with MIS, a formal DSMC will conduct periodic reviews of safety including two planned formal interim analyses for futility (harm) after accrual of 370 and 640 patients using an aggressive Lan-DeMets beta-spending function similar to a Pocock boundary. Results of this trial may be practice changing and will either support or refute the findings of the LACC trial. The study is currently activating sites for enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT04831580.
5563 Background: PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are approved for maintenance treatment of platinum sensitive ovarian cancers either after front-line therapy or after treatment for recurrence. Current recommendations include retreatment with platinum-based chemotherapy (PC) after progression on maintenance PARPi. There exists a theoretical concern that progression of disease (POD) on PARPi is indicative of the development of platinum resistance due to similar DNA targets of platinum chemotherapy and PARPi. Our objective was to evaluate the response to subsequent chemotherapy in patients who progressed on PARPi maintenance. Methods: All patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer treated with PARPi treatment from 2017 to 2021 at two academic tertiary care centers were retrospectively identified. Patients were assessed for treatment time on PARPi, time to POD on PARPi (PFS), type of chemotherapy regimen following PARPi maintenance, and time to disease progression on subsequent therapy following PARPi (PFS2). Comparative statistical analyses were performed with appropriate two-sided statistical tests. Time to progression on chemotherapy after PARPi was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 83 ovarian cancer patients treated with PARPi were identified, and of these, 61 (73.5%) were treated with PARPi in the maintenance setting. Among the patients treated with PARPi maintenance, 22 (36.1%) remain on treatment. 19 (31.1%) patients were started on PARPi maintenance after front-line chemotherapy. While on PARPi maintenance, 63.9% discontinued PARPi, the majority due to POD, and 26.2% due to patient intolerance of side effects. Following POD, 21/29 (72.4%) received subsequent PC and 8/29 (27.6%) received non-platinum based chemotherapy (NPC). Treatment time, PFS, and PFS2 are listed in Table. Of the patients who received PC, 14/21 (66.7%) had a PFS2 of over six months and 5/21 (23.8%) had a PFS2 of over 12 months. Of the patients who received NPC, 7/8 (87.5%) had a PFS2 of over six months and 2/8 (25.0%) had a PFS2 of over 12 months. Conclusions: Following POD on PARPi, patients responded to both PC and NPC. Time to progression on subsequent chemotherapy after treatment with PARPi does not differ significantly between PC and NPC regimens. Many patients continue to see benefit from PC after PARPi maintenance. Retreatment with PC following POD on PARPi maintenance should still be considered.[Table: see text]
Highlights The majority of respondents evaluate lymph nodes via sentinel lymph node mapping for grade 1–2 endometrial cancer. Only 50% of respondents perform intraoperative sentinel lymph node mapping for grade 3 endometrial cancer. 90% of respondents give chemotherapy-based adjuvant treatment for advanced endometrial cancer. 75% of respondents combine radiation therapy with chemotherapy in stage III endometrial cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.