Due to the fact that this disease is of an intricate nature, and that many of its symptoms overlap with other concomitant diseases, it could be suggested to classify the patients with emphasis on the phenotype, as well as their symptom clusters, to tailor the diagnostic and management choices according to the observed biomarkers.
The ureteroscope sizes diminished with advancements in technology. Small-sized ureteroscopes can provide low intrarenal pressures with good irrigation flow when used with convenient small-sized access sheaths. The compatibility between the ureteroscopes and UASs should be anticipated by all endourologists and considered during F-URS. The advantages of 10/12 UASs in terms of intrarenal pressure and irrigational flow should make these access sheaths an interesting first-line choice.
Objective Our aim was to study the efficacy of transvaginal bilateral sacrospinous fixation (TBSF) and its impact on quality of life (QoL) and sexual functions in women affected by second recurrences of vaginal vault prolapse (VVP). Materials and Methods We performed a prospective observational study on 20 sexually active patients affected by second recurrence of VVP, previously treated with monolateral sacrospinous fixation. TBSF was performed in all the patients. They had been evaluated before the surgery and at 12-month follow-up through pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system, Short Form-36 (SF-36), and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Results At 12-month follow-up, 18 out of 20 (90%) patients were cured of their recurrent VVP. No major intra- and postoperative complications occurred. We found a significant improvement in 4/5 POP-Q landmarks (excluding total vaginal length), SF-36, and PISQ-12 scores. Conclusion According to our data analysis, TBSF appears to be safe, effective, and able to improve both QoL and sexual functions in patients affected by second recurrence of VVP after previous monolateral sacrospinous fixation.
Laser use during flexible ureteroscopy may cause increased intrarenal temperatures. Rapid increases should be kept in mind when irrigation is closed. The irrigation seems to limit the temperature increase when used with any laser setting.
The aim of our current study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of vaporesection using a 120-W Tm:YAG laser (Revolix Duo) in patients with BPH receiving systemic anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy. Between April 2010 and November 2011, a total of 76 patients using oral antiplatelet or anticoagulant (OA) agents affected by LUTS for BPH were underwent thulium vaporesection of the prostate (ThuVARP) using a 120-W 2-μm CW Tm:YAG laser and evaluated at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Of these, in 41 patients (group A) was performed vaporesection while receiving OA therapy. In 35 patients (group B), OA agents were discontinued 10 days before surgery. There were no significant differences in average vaporesection times, catheterization time, or hospital stay. There was no significant change in serum sodium level before and immediately after vaporesection in either group. Significant improvements compared to baseline were observed at each postoperative assessment in both groups for Qmax, PVR, IPSS, and QoL. More specifically, the IPSS score improved from 21.7 at baseline to 5.2 at 6 months in group A and from 20.7 to 4.5 in group B. At 6 months, Qmax increased 226 and 190 % for the 2 groups, respectively. The PVR decreased from 119 at baseline to 11 mL at 6 months in group A and from 125 to 11 mL in group B. ThuVARP is a safe and efficient procedure for patients with BPH, refractory to pharmacotherapy, who require active antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.