No abstract
Summary the article deals with problems of the current globalized world with constant multi-cultural interaction. the intercultural tangle of cultural interdependence, multiple cultural relations, influences, exchanges visible throughout thousands of years of civilization in history have intensified exponentially in recent decades. this tangle has become more sophisticated and complicated due to the complex of the present sociocultural transformations. However, no matter what form of cultural interaction occurs in local and global contexts, one's culture keeps one's stamina constant. It is one of the cornerstones of any culture, nation, or state derivative ideal. SaNtraukaStraipsnis skirtas dabartiniame globalėjančiame pasaulyje vis aktualesnei ir itin svarbiai įvairių kultūrų sąveikos problemai, kuri autorės suvokiama kaip konstanta. tarpkultūrinės sampynos, kultūrų tarpusavio priklausomybė, daugialypiai kultūriniai ryšiai, įtakos, mainai regimi visoje tūkstančių metų civilizacijos istorijoje, tačiau pastaraisiais dešimtmečiais, plėtojantis komunikacijoms, jie intensyvėja nepaprastai sparčiai, dermės kinta ir darosi vis įmantresnės bei komplikuotesnės, šitaip atspindėdamos sudėtingiausius dabarties sociokultūrinius virsmus. tačiau kad ir kokius pavidalus įgautų kultūrų sąveika lokaliuose ar globaliuose kontekstuose, ji išlaiko nekintamą savo tvermę, kuri yra vienas esminių bet kurios kultūros, tautos, valstybinio darinio sandų.
Gauta 2018 01 17 Salomėja jaStrumSkytė lietuvos kultūros tyrimų institutas lithuanian Culture research Institute raktaŽoDŽIaI: kasdienis gyvenimas, kasdienybės estetika, estetinis patyrimas, Čiurlionis. kEy WorDS: everyday life, everyday aesthetics, aesthetic experience, Čiurlionis. kaSDIENyBėS EStEtIka m. k. ČIurlIoNIo EPIStolIarINIamE PalIkImE Everyday asthetics in m. k. Čiurlionis Epistolary Heritage Summary the article assumes that Čiurlionis' creative heritage can be articulated from the perspective of everyday aesthetics. First, the conception of everyday aesthetics, currently in a stage of intense formation, is presented without encompassing all of its current multifaceted aspects and branches. Second, the main questions posed in the article include: How far has Čiurlionis experienced his everyday life aesthetically? How much did he reflect it? Did he understand everyday life and its constituent elements separately or subordinated to art? Can these miscellaneous aesthetic experiences of everyday life that Čiurlionis so subtly documented in his letters and other writings, be researched in the everyday life conception of aesthetics. SaNtrauka Straipsnyje keliama prielaida, kad Čiurlionio kūrybinį palikimą galima tyrinėti ir artikuliuoti iš kasdienybės estetikos perspektyvos. tad visų pirma pateikiama šiuo metu labai dinamiška ir intensyviai besiformuojanti kasdienybės estetikos samprata, nors nesiekiama apimti visų įvairialypių dabartinių jos išraiškų ir atšakų. Esminiai klausimai, kurie keliami straipsnyje: kiek Čiurlionis estetiškai patyrė savo kasdienį gyvenimą, kiek jį reflektavo, kiek kasdienybę ir jos sudedamuosius patirtinius elementus suvokė atsietus ar subordinuotus menui bei kiek šiuos įvairialypius estetinius kasdienybės patyrimus, kuriuos Čiurlionis subtiliai dokumentuoja savo laiškuose ir kitame rašytiniame palikime, galima tyrinėti pastaruoju metu besiformuojančios kasdienybės estetikos prieigomis. ĮvaDaS Šiame straipsnyje, siekiant numatyti erdvesnes kasdienybės estetikos ty-rimo Čiurlionio kūryboje gaires, bus parodomas, tarsi in vitro, dabartinės Salomėja jaStrumSkytė
Gauta 2018 07 11 Salomėja jaStrumSkytė Lietuvos kultūros tyrimų institutas, lietuva lithuanian Culture research Institute, lithuania raktaŽoDŽIaI: kasdienis gyvenimas, estetika, kasdienybės estetika, estetinis patyrimas, Čiurlionis.
Salomėja jaStrumSkytė Lietuvos kultūros tyrimų institutas, lietuva lithuanian Culture research Institute, lithuania raktažodžIaI: okuliarcentrizmas, rega, akis, estetika, juvelyrika, lobis. key wordS: ocularcentrism, sight, eye, aesthetics, jewelery, treasure. okulIarCeNtrIStINėS eStetIkoS atVertyS Ir GrĮžtyS: akIS Ir loByNaS discovering and rebounding the ocularcentristic aesthetics: an eye and a treasure Summary the article is devoted to the conceptual and historical analysis of the eclipse of ocularcentristic aesthetics and to the opening of opportunities for the present visual aesthetic discourse of visual culture. the text highlights two main opportunities for the development of ocularcentristic aesthetics-such as eye apologetics and mistrust, denial and contempt. the analysis of specific examples of art history and analysis of aesthetical perceptions shows that the different parts of the human sensorium, which make up a complete multisensory tissue, become a consequence of the fluctuation of this bipolar phenomenon. From here, the distrust of the pre-eminence and supremacy of the eye, which is most noticeable in French aesthetics and art philosophy, has emerged in modernist consciousness. In the long run, it also spread to the english and German speaking countries, reaching the epoch of the 20th century, when the French philosophical doubts were fruitfully taken over by american art philosophers; in turn, the unpredictability of the eye was already overwrought by modern art and became the self-image of the current post-modern visual culture and aesthetic and artistic consciousness. Summary the article is devoted to the conceptual and historical analysis of the eclipse of ocularcentristic aesthetics and to the opening of opportunities for the present visual aesthetic discourse of visual culture. the text highlights two main opportunities for the development of ocularcentristic aesthetics-such as eye apologetics and mistrust, and even denial and contempt. according to the analysis of specific examples of art history and analysis of aesthetical perceptions, the article shows that the different parts of the human sensorium, which make up a complete multisensory tissue, become more and more as a consequence of the fluctuation of this bipolar phenomenon. From here, the distrust of the pre-eminence and supremacy
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.