This meta-analysis of all published randomized trials provides the best current estimate of the effectiveness of cell salvage and is useful in guiding clinical practice. We conclude that cell salvage in orthopedic surgery decreases the proportion of patients requiring allogeneic blood transfusion perioperatively, but postoperative cell salvage is only marginally effective in cardiac surgery.
The aim of the study was to analyze the factors influencing peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection after high-dose cyclophosphamide (HDCYC) (7 g/m 2 ) and hematopoietic recovery after autologous transplantation of HDCYC-mobilized PBPC (ABPCT) in 116 patients with aggressive multiple myeloma (MM). Following HDCYC 74 patients received hematopoietic growth factors (HGF), either G-CSF (n = 19) or GM-CSF (n = 55). All the patients were subsequently planned to undergo ABPCT. PBPC collection was possible for 106 patients. The most important prognostic factor for collection of more than 25 × 10 4 CFU-GM cells/kg and 2 × 10 6 CD34 + cells/kg was the use of HGF (P = 0.002 and 0.009, respectively). Previous use of an alkylating agent, response to treatment before HDCYC, and interval between diagnosis and HDCYC were also significant factors (P = 0.004, 0.025 and 0.001, respectively). The number of CFU-GM cells infused was the most important parameter for rapid and complete hematological recovery after ABPCT (P Ͻ 0.0001). Thus the use of HGF post-HDCYC is the major factor which, associated with reduced time between diagnosis and HDCYC and the use of an alkylating agent, could increase the numbers of hematopoietic progenitors collected, and subsequently improve hematopoietic recovery following ABPCT in MM patients.
While methodologic issues had very little impact on the ISPOT meta-analyses, further studies are needed in a variety of other clinical settings. Because MEDLINE, coupled with a review of the references in the identified trials, identified the vast majority of trials, one needs to consider the costs and benefits of searching EMBASE and the pursuance of unpublished and unindexed trials.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.