1. The proton pump inhibitors lansoprazole (LP) and omeprazole (OP) and the cholecystokinin (CCK)-receptor antagonist PD-136450 (PD) provide a broad spectrum of activities in their ability to inhibit gastric acid secretion and protect the stomach against ulcerogens. In the present study, we investigated the protective effects of these compounds against gastric ulcers induced by acidified ethanol (AE) and indomethacin. 2. Both AE (60% ethanol in 150 mmol/L HCl, 1 mL/rat) and indomethacin (30 mg/kg) produced gastric haemorrhagic lesions in the rat 1 and 6 h after oral administration, respectively. 3. The gastric mucosal protective effects of LP (1-20 mg/kg), OP (0.5-10 mg/kg) and PD (1-20 mg/kg), administered either orally or subcutaneously (s.c.) 30 min before the administration of AE or indomethacin, were dose dependent against both models of ulcer induction. 4. To determine whether the cytoprotective effect of LP, OP and PD (each 10 mg/kg) was mediated by endogenous prostaglandins (PG), indomethacin (10 mg/kg, s.c.) was administered 15 min before AE to inhibit prostanoids biosynthesis. Indomethacin reduced the cytoprotective effects of OP, but not LP, administered either orally or s.c. Indomethacin reduced the cytoprotective effect of PD administered orally, although the effect was much less significant than when PD was administered s.c. The results exclude the role of PG in mediating the protective effects of LP, whereas the possibility exists for PG to have a role in mediating the protective effects of OP and PD. 5. To investigate the possible involvement of endogenous nitric oxide (NO) in the cytoprotective action of LP, OP and PD, we treated rats with a selective inhibitor of NO synthesis, namely NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME; 25 mg/kg, s.c.). Administration of L-NAME 15 min prior to LP, OP or PD (each 10 mg/kg) orally or s.c. and challenge with AE or indomethacin did not significantly increase the degree of the ulcer index and L-NAME was not able to antagonize the protective effects of LP, OP and PD, thus excluding the role of NO in mediating the protective effects of these drugs. However, the effects of PD in reducing the indomethacin-induced ulcer index were less significant in the presence than the absence of L-NAME (P < 0.05 vs P < 0.001, respectively), suggesting a role for NO. 6. In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that LP and OP are equally effective against AE- as well as indomethacin-induced gastric ulcers and were more potent than PD in protecting the stomach against ulcer formation. Lansoprazole, OP and PD bring about their cytoprotective action through the reduction of acid secretion and some other unknown mechanisms. However, OP and PD may exert their cytoprotective action through PG and NO pathways.
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) such as ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) are diseases of the gastrointestinal system involving genetic and environmental factors attributed to oxidative stress and inflammation. Targeting oxidative stress and inflammation by novel dietary compounds of natural origin convincingly appears to be one of the important therapeutic strategies to keep the disease in remission. As there is no permanent cure for IBD except for chronic long-term treatment or surgery, it is therefore imperative to investigate plant-based agents that are receiving attention for their therapeutic benefits to overcome the debilitating clinical conditions of IBD. Lycopodium (LYCO), a plant of tropical and subtropical origin and known by numerous names such as ground pine, club moss, or devil’s claw, has been popularly used for centuries in traditional medicine including Chinese and Indian medicines. In the present study, the effect of LYCO has been investigated in an acetic acid (AA)-induced colitis model in Wistar rats. LYCO was orally administered at the dose of 50 mg/kg/day either 3 days before or 30 min after the induction of IBD and continued for 7 days by intrarectal administration of AA. The changes in body weight and macroscopic and microscopic analysis of the colon of rats of different experimental groups were observed on days 0, 2, 4, and 7. The levels of myeloperoxidase (MPO), reduced glutathione (GSH), and malondialdehyde (MDA) were measured. AA caused a significant reduction in body weight and increased macroscopic and microscopic ulcer scores along with a significant decline in antioxidant enzymes, superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase and antioxidant substrate, glutathione (GSH). There was a concomitant increased formation of malondialdehyde (MDA), a marker of lipid peroxidation, and raised myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, a marker of neutrophil activation. Treatment with LYCO significantly improved IBD-induced reduction in body weight, improved histology, inhibited MDA formation, and restored antioxidants along with reduced MPO activity. AA also caused the release of proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and interleukin-23 (IL-23). Furthermore, AA also increased the levels of calprotectin, a protein released by neutrophils under inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal tract. LYCO treatment significantly reduced the release of calprotectin and proinflammatory cytokines. The results demonstrate that LYCO treatment has the potential to improve disease activity by inhibiting oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, and inflammation along with histological preservation of colonic tissues.
The results of this study indicate that LTG administered i.p. at high doses can induce intrauterine growth retardation and at low multiple doses causes a dose-dependent increase in embryonic resorption, craniofacial and caudal malformations as well as maternal toxicity in the mouse. Previous studies in other laboratories have used oral route of exposure and concluded that there are no teratogenic effects of LTG at dose levels that are not maternally toxic.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.