Transvaginal ultrasound guided oocyte retrieval (TVOR) during in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment was first described in 1985. By virtue of its simplicity and effectiveness, it has gained widespread popularity and has now become the gold standard for IVF therapy. Nevertheless, despite the advantages, the aspiration needle may injure the adjacent pelvic organs and structures leading to serious complications. The most common complications are haemorrhage, trauma and injury of pelvic structures, and pelvic infection. Other complications described include adnexal torsion, rupture of endometriotic cysts, anaesthetic, and even vertebral osteomyelitis. In the last two decades, several reports have described the complications associated with this technique, and tried to address the risk factors and safety issues. However there is wide variation in the way this common procedure is performed, with room for improvement through published guidelines. This article reviews the most common complications reported in literature, summarizes the recommendations made to minimize their occurrence, and raises some of the controversial issues related to the procedure especially that of pelvic infection.
The purpose of the trial was to determine whether a sustained release preparation of prostaglandin E2 (Propess) is better in inducing labour when compared with the more widely used short-acting (instant-release) preparation (Prostin). A randomised controlled clinical trial involving 100 pregnant women at term with an indication for induction of labour was conducted in a district general hospital in the UK over a 1-year period. Women were randomised to receive one of the two preparations. The study revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in time to onset of labour, duration of labour, total time from induction to delivery, method of delivery, and analgesia requirements. The number of preparations required to induce labour were significantly less in the Propess group. Our data suggest that both Propess and Prostin are safe and effective in induction of labour, for either primips or multips. However, Prostin use is more cost-effective.
With routine obstetric ultrasound examinations, ovarian cysts are now more commonly diagnosed during pregnancy and their management is still a challenging clinical issue among obstetricians. The aim of this paper is to review the different management options of ovarian cysts detected during pregnancy, and it highlights the emergence of laparoscopic technique as a valuable therapeutic tool in these conditions. The review shows that conservative management and ultrasound follow-up is sufficient for the majority of cases of ovarian cysts during pregnancy. It also discusses the limitations of tumour markers during pregnancy, and the controversy around ultrasound-guided aspiration procedures. Emerging evidence suggests that if surgery is necessary, then it is preferable to perform an elective laparoscopic procedure at 16 - 23 weeks' gestation. It is time to consider establishing a UK registry to monitor the treatment offered to those women and to develop national guidelines to help in the management of this controversial issue.
We present a case series and literature review on the use of rescue human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in cases of empty follicle syndrome (EFS) after a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger. EFS was diagnosed after failure to collect any oocytes from one ovary. In such cases, a single dose of hCG was administered and the oocyte retrieval was repeated 36 h later. The main outcome measures were the number of mature oocytes (M2) and embryos (2PN), incidence of hospitalisation for severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and clinical pregnancy when fresh embryo transfers occurred. Our population consisted of 322 patients, who had a GnRH agonist as oocyte maturation trigger (2-mg subcutaneous buserelin). Six patients (1.8%) developed EFS after the use of a GnRHa trigger. Mature oocytes were retrieved in 5 patients after the use of rescue hCG. One patient developed severe OHSS. Two patients had a fresh embryo transfer and one clinical pregnancy was reported. This is the first case series to report fresh embryo transfers and a clinical pregnancy with the use of rescue hCG after failure of the GnRHa trigger.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether age-specific FSH concentration can be a predictor of the outcome of ovarian stimulation in women undergoing IVF, with various basal FSH (bFSH) concentrations but within the normal range, i.e. < or = 9.5 lU/l. A total of 1373 women undergoing their first NF cycle over a 5-year period were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were grouped according to age, and within each age range, patients were grouped into bFSH quartiles. The primary outcome measure was oocyte yield, and secondary outcome measures included number of normally fertilized oocytes (2PN), number of embryos transferred and frozen, as well as implantation, biochemical, and clinical pregnancy rates. In all study groups (25-29; 30-34 and 35-39 years), women with low bFSH concentrations had significantly more oocytes retrieved (P = 0.003; P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0001 respectively), and more normally fertilized 2PN embryos (P = 0.03; P < 0.0001 and P = 0.001 respectively) than those of the same age with 'high' normal bFSH concentrations. Although there was no significant difference in the secondary outcome measures, these were generally more favourable in patients with 'low' age-specific bFSH concentrations. The findings of this study suggest that age-specific FSH testing can serve as a good predictor of the oocyte yield in women with normal bFSH concentrations undergoing IVF.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.