Background Everolimus, an oral inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), has shown antitumor activity in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, in two phase 2 studies. We evaluated the agent in a prospective, randomized, phase 3 study. Methods We randomly assigned 410 patients who had advanced, low-grade or intermediate-grade pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with radiologic progression within the previous 12 months to receive everolimus, at a dose of 10 mg once daily (207 patients), or placebo (203 patients), both in conjunction with best supportive care. The primary end point was progression-free survival in an intention-to-treat analysis. In the case of patients in whom radiologic progression occurred during the study, the treatment assignments could be revealed, and patients who had been randomly assigned to placebo were offered open-label everolimus. Results The median progression-free survival was 11.0 months with everolimus as compared with 4.6 months with placebo (hazard ratio for disease progression or death from any cause with everolimus, 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27 to 0.45; P<0.001), representing a 65% reduction in the estimated risk of progression or death. Estimates of the proportion of patients who were alive and progression-free at 18 months were 34% (95% CI, 26 to 43) with everolimus as compared with 9% (95% CI, 4 to 16) with placebo. Drug-related adverse events were mostly grade 1 or 2 and included stomatitis (in 64% of patients in the everolimus group vs. 17% in the placebo group), rash (49% vs. 10%), diarrhea (34% vs. 10%), fatigue (31% vs. 14%), and infections (23% vs. 6%), which were primarily upper respiratory. Grade 3 or 4 events that were more frequent with everolimus than with placebo included anemia (6% vs. 0%) and hyperglycemia (5% vs. 2%). The median exposure to everolimus was longer than exposure to placebo by a factor of 2.3 (38 weeks vs. 16 weeks). Conclusions Everolimus, as compared with placebo, significantly prolonged progression-free survival among patients with progressive advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and was associated with a low rate of severe adverse events.

PurposeNo established treatment exists for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET) progression after failure of chemotherapy. Everolimus (RAD001), an oral inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin, in combination with octreotide has demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity in patients with NETs.Patients and MethodsThis open-label, phase II study assessed the clinical activity of everolimus in patients with metastatic pancreatic NETs who experienced progression on or after chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by prior octreotide therapy (stratum 1: everolimus 10 mg/d, n = 115; stratum 2: everolimus 10 mg/d plus octreotide long-acting release [LAR], n = 45). Tumor assessments (using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) were performed every 3 months. Chromogranin A (CgA) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) were assessed monthly if elevated at baseline. Trough concentrations of everolimus and octreotide were assessed.ResultsBy central radiology review, in stratum 1, there were 11 partial responses (9.6%), 78 patients (67.8%) with stable disease (SD), and 16 patients (13.9%) with progressive disease; median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.7 months. In stratum 2, there were two partial responses (4.4%), 36 patients (80%) with SD, and no patients with progressive disease; median PFS was 16.7 months. Patients with an early CgA or NSE response had a longer PFS compared with patients without an early response. Coadministration of octreotide LAR and everolimus did not impact exposure to either drug. Most adverse events were mild to moderate and were consistent with those previously seen with everolimus.ConclusionDaily everolimus, with or without concomitant octreotide LAR, demonstrates antitumor activity as measured by objective response rate and PFS and is well tolerated in patients with advanced pancreatic NETs after failure of prior systemic chemotherapy.

Elevated baseline CgA/NSE provided prognostic information on PFS and survival; early CgA/NSE responses are potential prognostic markers for treatment outcomes in patients with advanced pNET.

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) play important roles in the regulation of cellular growth, and mutated or overexpressed RTKs have been implicated in various human cancers. Sunitinib malate is an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antitumour and antiangiogenic activity that recently received approval from the FDA for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma and of gastrointestinal stromal tumours after disease progression on or intolerance to imatinib mesilate therapy. Sunitinib has also demonstrated promising clinical activity in the treatment of other advanced solid tumours. The present review provides an updated summary of emerging clinical experience with this promising new anticancer agent.

No abstract

The prevalence of hypertension in the urban black population in Sub-Saharan Africa is high and varies from 20% to 25%. In contrast, the prevalence of hypertension in the rural black is relatively low. In Natal the prevalence of hypertension in a large metropolitan city, Durban, is 25% in the adult Zulu, 17.2% in whites, and 14.2% in Indians. The prevalence of hypertension in the rural Zulu of Natal is 10%. Work on the pathogenesis of hypertension in the Zulu and Indian ethnic groups related to renin, aldosterone, dietary sodium and potassium, and intracellular sodium and potassium was virtually nonexistent. This review paper summarizes the salient features that were found.

Background: Vatalanib inhibits endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) by binding to the intracellular kinase domain of all 3 VEGFRs. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) express VEGF receptors. Inhibiting VEGF with bevacizumab, sorafenib, and sunitinib reduced time to progression or tumor size in some NET patients (pts). To determine vatalanib_s tolerability and efficacy in NET pts, a trial was performed.Methods: Eligibility criteria included NET pts with biopsy-proven metastatic disease and rising biomarkers on somatostatin analog therapy. Eligible pts had measurable lesions, a KPS 9 60%, and normal hematologic, renal, and hepatic functions. A stable octreotide LAR dose, not exceeding 30 mg monthly, was required. Initial total daily dosing of vatalanib was 1,250 mg. Biochemical responses within a 90 day interval were the primary response criteria. Secondary endpoints included radiographic/scintigraphic scan changes and safety.Results: Twenty-four pts (12 males) were enrolled between 5/20/05 to 5/28/09.The median age (range) was 60.4 (25Y74). Eighteen pts were evaluable for efficacy and safety. Four pts continue on therapy. One pt withdrew consent; 2 pts died of disease prior to first cycle initiation; 1 pt was allergic to vatalanib. Six pts required a 10Y28 day discontinuation for rising SGOT/SGPT, alkaline phosphatase, G2 proteinuria, G2 headache, and G3 nausea/vomiting. Resumption of vatalanib at 1,000 mg daily was well tolerated in 2 pts and 750 mg in another. One pt developed carcinoid crisis with fever, flushing, and rising 5HIAA. Grade 1 nausea occurred in 15 pts with antiemetics required for 4 pts. A partial (9 50% decrease) biochemical response occurred in 4 pts. The observed radiographic and scintigraphic responses in 16 pts have shown progressive disease in 6 and stable/minimal response in 10 pts. Accrual continues.Conclusions: Vatalanib is well tolerated in most pts and results in a 24% biochemical partial response rate in NET pts with rising biochemical markers on somatostatin analog therapy.Background: Health-related quality of life (HRQL) can be disrupted in patients with chronic illnesses such as cancer. The study evaluated the HRQL burden of patients with neuroendocrine tumor (NET), testing the hypothesis that NET patients have reduced HRQL compared to the general United States population.Methods: NET patients were invited via email to participate in an online, anonymous survey. This survey consisted of a brief set of demographic and disease-related items, the RAND-36 and the PROMIS-29, the latter two of which are standardized measures of HRQL with general population normative values available for comparison. Norm-based scores were calculated for all subscales, such that a score of 50 represents the mean of the general population (standard deviation = 10). For the anxiety and fatigue subscale, higher scores (9 50) represent worse outcome. Results are presented as means and 95% confidence intervals.Results: Data collection is currently ongoing but at the time of this writing 565 eligible participants ...

No abstract