No abstract

Existing opinion mining studies have focused on and explored only two types of reviews, that is, regular and comparative. There is a visible gap in determining the useful review types from customers and designers perspective. Based on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and statistical measures we examine users' perception about different review types and its effects in terms of behavioral intention towards using online review system. By using sample of users (N = 400) and designers (N = 106), current research work studies three review types, A (regular), B (comparative), and C (suggestive), which are related to perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and behavioral intention. The study reveals that positive perception of the use of suggestive reviews improves users' decision making in business intelligence. The results also depict that type C (suggestive reviews) could be considered a new useful review type in addition to other types, A and B.

Software testing is an important but expensive phase of software development life cycle. During software testing and retesting, development organizations always desire to validate the software from different views. But exhaustive testing requires program execution with all possible combinations of values for program variables, which is impractical due to resource constraints. For many applications, it is possible to generate test cases automatically. But the core problem is the selection of effective test cases necessary to validate the program during the maintenance phase. This target can only be achieved by eliminating all the redundant test cases from the generated pool of test suites. In this paper, we propose a novel test case reduction technique called TestFilter that uses the statement-coverage criterion for reduction of test cases. To demonstrate the applicability of this approach, we conduct an experimental study. The results show that our technique is beneficial in identifying non-redundant test cases at a little cost. Ultimately it is beneficial to optimize time & cost spent on testing and it is also helpful during regression testing.

Abstract-Unified Modeling Language (UML) has become the de-facto standard to design today's large-size object-oriented systems. However, focusing on multiple UML diagrams is a main cause of breaching the consistency problem, which ultimately reduces the overall software model's quality. Consistency management techniques are widely used to ensure the model consistency by correct model-to-model and model-to-code transformation. Consistency management becomes a promising area of research especially for model-driven architecture. In this paper, we extensively review UML consistency management techniques. The proposed techniques have been classified based on the parameters identified from the research literature. Moreover, we performed a qualitative comparison of consistency management techniques in order to identify current research trends, challenges and research gaps in this field of study. Based on the results, we concluded that researchers have not provided more attention on exploring inter-model and semantic consistency problems. Furthermore, state-of-the-art consistency management techniques mostly focus only on three UML diagrams (i.e., class, sequence and state chart) and the remaining UML diagrams have been overlooked. Consequently, due to this incomplete body of knowledge, researchers are unable to take full advantage of overlooked UML diagrams, which may be otherwise useful to handle the consistency management challenge in an efficient manner.

Abstract-Software testing is a widely accepted practice that ensures the quality of a System under Test (SUT). However, the gradual increase of the test suite size demands high portion of testing budget and time. Test Suite Reduction (TSR) is considered a potential approach to deal with the test suite size problem. Moreover, a complete automation support is highly recommended for software testing to adequately meet the challenges of a resource constrained testing environment. Several TSR frameworks and tools have been proposed to efficiently address the test-suite size problem. The main objective of the paper is to comprehensively review the state-of-the-art TSR frameworks to highlights their strengths and weaknesses. Furthermore, the paper focuses on devising a detailed thematic taxonomy to classify existing literature that helps in understanding the underlying issues and proof of concept. Moreover, the paper investigates critical aspects and related features of TSR frameworks and tools based on a set of defined parameters. We also rigorously elaborated various testing domains and approaches followed by the extant TSR frameworks. The results reveal that majority of TSR frameworks focused on randomized unit testing, and a considerable number of frameworks lacks in supporting multi-objective optimization problems. Moreover, there is no generalized framework, effective for testing applications developed in any programming domain. Conversely, Integer Linear Programming (ILP) based TSR frameworks provide an optimal solution for multi-objective optimization problems and improve execution time by running multiple ILP in parallel. The study concludes with new insights and provides an unbiased view of the state-of-the-art TSR frameworks. Finally, we present potential research issues for further investigation to anticipate efficient TSR frameworks.

No abstract

Software maintenance is an important phase of a development life cycle that needs to be essentially performed in order to avoid the software failure. To systematically handle the bugs (defects), the software development organization develops a bug report that demonstrates the vulnerabilities from the software under test. However, manually handling the bug reports is a laborious, tedious, and time-consuming task. Moreover, the bug repository receives large numbers of bug reports on daily basis, which demands to timely fix the found and received bugs. Motivated by this, current work proposes an automated bug prioritization and assignment technique, called LCBPA (Long short-term memory, Content-based filtering for Bug Prioritization and Assignment). To perform the bug prioritization, we employed Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) to predict the priority of the bug report. In contrast, for bug assignment, we used contentbased filtering, where the prioritized bug reports are automatically assigned to the developers based on their previous knowledge. The performance of the proposed bug prioritization model is determined by comparing with the state-of-the-art bug prioritization techniques using precision, recall and f1-score. Similarly, the effectiveness of the bug assignment model is evaluated by defining various case scenarios. The results show that the proposed LCBPA technique outperforms the current state-of-the-art bug prioritization techniques (with a 22% increase in F1-score), and also efficiently handles the bug assignment problem compared to the existing bug assignment techniques.

PurposeSimilarly, Zhu et al. (2014) and Zhang et al. (2014) stated that addressing privacy concerns with the recommendation process is necessary for the healthy development of app recommendation. Recently, Xiao et al. (2020) mentioned that a lack of effective privacy policy hinders the development of personalized recommendation services. According to the reported work, privacy protection technology methods are too limited for mobile focusing on data encryption, anonymity, disturbance, elimination of redundant data to protect the recommendation process from privacy breaches. So, this situation motivated us to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) to provide the viewpoint of privacy and security concerns as mentioned in current state-of-the-art in the mobile app recommendation domain.Design/methodology/approachIn this work, the authors have followed Kitchenham guidelines (Kitchenham and Charters, 2007) to devise the SLR process. According to the guidelines, the SLR process has three main phases: (1) define, (2) conduct the search and (3) report the results. Furthermore, the authors used systematic mapping approach as well to ensure the whole process.FindingsBased on the selected studies, the authors proposed three main thematic taxonomies, including architectural style, security and privacy strategies, and user-usage in the mobile app recommendation domain. From the studies' synthesis viewpoint, it is observed that the majority of the research efforts have focused on the movie recommendation field, while the mainly used privacy scheme is homomorphic encryption. Finally, the authors suggested a set of future research dimensions useful for the potential researchers interested to perform the research in the mobile app recommendation domain.Originality/valueThis is an SLR article, based on existing published research, where the authors identified key issues and future directions.