No abstract

No abstract

Casing while drilling (CwD) technology is designed to reduce drilling time and expenses by improving the wellbore stability, fracture gradient, and formation damage while reducing the exposure time. However, for the purpose well control, the wellbore geometry and volumes differ from those obtained via a conventional drilling technique, thereby requiring a different approach. This study discusses well control principles for CwD operations. It presents a simplified method for evaluating the maximum kick tolerance and allowable well shut-in time for both conventional and CwD techniques using a mathematical model. Preliminary results revealed that the use of CwD leads to an annulus pressure loss three times higher than that observed in the conventional drilling. In addition, the kick tolerance is reduced by 50% and the maximum allowable well shut-in time is reduced by 65%, making an early kick detection system necessary.

Nowadays, deep-water drilling is of great importance for the development of oil and gas production. It is necessary to determine the maximum pressure that the formation can withstand during well control operation. This value can be calculated using several variables, including kick tolerance. The purpose of this study is to analyze a real well control event using dynamic well control modeling software that calculates the kick tolerance based on the single-phase and multiphase dispersed kick (gas) model. The initial results show that the type of drilling fluid plays an important role in the calculation of the kick tolerance. The calculated kick tolerance using a single-phase model indicates an allowable kick volume of 56 barrels (bbls), but in reality, we had a dispersed gas kick in a synthetic oil-based mud (SOBM) drilling fluid, which requires special kick tolerance calculations based on a multiphase dynamic model. After reviewing the results of the multiphase kick tolerance simulation, it was found that the maximum gas kick volume is more than twice that of using a single-phase model in an oil-based mud drilling fluid, allowing safe well control operations and reducing the possibility of accidents.

In this research paper, a new methodology to design a progressive and win-win royalty model for upstream fiscal systems is developed.  The proposed royalty model is designed as a function of different boundary conditions of the market and the productive resources. These boundary conditions include the associated exploration and production risks, commodity prices, the extraction costs, besides the expected production and depletion rate. The behavior of the proposed royalty model under different oil prices, development costs, production rates, and exploration risks is investigated using deterministic and stochastic analysis. Our results prove that the applicable royalty rate increases with both the price and production rate while it decreases with increasing the development costs and the associated exploration and production risks. In addition, the proposed royalty model provides the contractor with sufficient incentives to develop marginal or low profitability fields and the development of deep offshore or frontier fields with high development and operating costs.