Background and Objective The complement system is engaged in inflammatory reactions both in the periodontal pockets and in the periodontium itself, where it can mediate tissue destruction. The aim of this study was, first, to compare salivary levels of the total complement system protein C3 and its split product, fluid‐phase C3c in patients with periodontitis and periodontally healthy controls. Next, to determine if C3 and C3c levels had biomarker potential in diagnosing and monitoring periodontitis and its treatment. We hypothesized that salivary levels of total C3 and the split product C3c associated with the severity of periodontitis and reflected decreased inflammatory activity after periodontal treatment. Methods At baseline, stimulated saliva samples were collected from patients with periodontitis (n = 18) and periodontally healthy controls (n = 15). Subsequently, non‐surgical periodontal treatment was performed in the patients, and saliva sampling from patients was repeated two‐, six‐, and twelve weeks post‐treatment (NCT02913248 at clinicaltrials.gov). The patients were grouped as good and poor responders to treatment according to the achieved reduction in bleeding on probing (BOP). Salivary levels of C3 and C3c were quantified using sandwich ELISA. Results Patients with periodontitis had higher baseline levels of both total C3 and the split product C3c in saliva than did periodontally healthy controls (P < .0001). Receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses discriminated patients with periodontitis from controls based on both C3 (AUC (area under curve) = 0.91, P < .001) and C3c levels (AUC = 0.84, P < .001) in saliva. Periodontal treatment improved all clinical parameters (P < .01). Good responders (n = 10) had lower baseline levels of C3c than poor responders (n = 8), (P < .05), and baseline levels of C3c discriminated between good and poor responders (AUC = 0.80, P < .05). Conclusion In conclusion, patients with periodontitis had higher salivary levels of C3c, and the C3c levels were predictive of reductions in BOP, that is, the poor responders. This suggests that salivary C3c levels possess potential to serve as a biomarker predicting the clinical response to non‐surgical periodontal treatment.
Background: The mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist spironolactone lowers blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension despite antihypertensive treatment with angiotensin-converting inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARB). In preclinical studies, spironolactone suppresses pro-hypertensive interleukin 17A (IL-17A).Objectives: Plasma samples were analysed from a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial with spironolactone given to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and resistant hypertension on three antihypertensive drugs. We tested the hypothesis that spironolactone-induced antihypertensive effects are associated with suppression of IL-17A and related cytokines.Methods: Interferon-g (IFN-g), IL-17A, tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a), IL-6, IL-1b and IL-10 were assessed in plasma with immunoassay in samples before and after 16 weeks of treatment with placebo or spironolactone (12.5-25-50 mg/day).Results: Spironolactone significantly reduced plasma IFN-g and IL-6 while IL-17A, TNF-a, IL-1b and IL-10 were unchanged. IL-6 was more sensitive to higher doses of spironolactone. At baseline, serum aldosterone correlated positively with diastolic night blood pressure. Urine albumin/creatinine-ratios correlated positively with plasma IL-6 at baseline. There were no relations between aldosterone and cytokine concentrations at baseline; between cytokine concentration and blood pressure at baseline; and between cytokine concentration decrease and blood pressure decrease, except for IFN-g, after treatment. The spironolactone-induced elevation in plasma potassium related inversely to blood pressure but not to changes in cytokines. In macrophages in vitro, spironolactone suppressed lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced TNF-a, IL-6, IL-1b and IL-10 levels. Conclusion:The antihypertensive action of spironolactone in resistant hypertensive patients is associated with suppressed IFN-g and IL-6 and not IL-17A. Spironolactone exerts anti-inflammatory actions in vivo on macrophages and T-cells.
Background The complement and coagulation systems share an evolutionary origin with many components showing structural homology. Certain components, including complement factor H (FH) and coagulation factor XII (FXII), have separately been shown to have auxiliary activities across the two systems. Objectives The interaction between FXII and FH was investigated. Methods Using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) complex formation between different FXII forms and FH was investigated. The presence of α‐FXIIa:FH complexes upon contact activation in plasma was evaluated by ELISA and immunoprecipitation. Results We identified and characterized a direct interaction between the components and demonstrated that among different forms of FXII, only the activated α‐FXIIa formed complexes with FH, with an apparent binding strength Kd of 34 ± 9 nmol/L. The complex formation involved the kringle domain of the heavy chain of FXII. C1‐inhibitor induced inhibition of α‐FXIIa did not alter the binding of α‐FXIIa toward FH. We further demonstrated the presence of α‐FXIIa:FH complexes in normal human plasma upon contact activation, indicating formation of α‐FXIIa:FH complexes as a consequence of α‐FXIIa generation. Complex formation between α‐FXIIa and FH was also assessed in hereditary angioedema (HAE) patients with C1‐inhibitor deficiency as well as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with high levels of anti‐cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti‐CCP) upon contact activation. We observed elevated levels of α‐FXIIa:FH complexes in HAE patients, and equal levels of complexes in RA patients and healthy individuals upon contact activation. Conclusion A direct interaction between α‐FXIIa and FH is demonstrated. Our findings represent a new crosstalk between these systems, potentially important in the onset and pathology of inflammatory vascular diseases.
Kidney transplantation is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity. Interleukin-17A (IL-17A) mediates kidney injury. Aldosterone promotes T-helper-17 (Th-17) lymphocyte differentiation and IL-17A production through the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR). In this exploratory, post-hoc substudy, it was hypothesized that 1-year intervention with the MR antagonist spironolactone lowers IL-17A and related cytokines and reduces epithelial injury in kidney transplant recipients. Plasma and urine samples were obtained from kidney transplant recipients from a double-blind randomized clinical trial testing spironolactone (n=39) versus placebo (n=41). Plasma concentrations of cytokines IFN-γ, IL-17A, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-10 were determined before and after 1-year treatment. Urine calbindin, clusterin, KIM-1, osteoactivin, TFF3, and VEGF/creatinine ratios were analyzed. Blood pressure and plasma aldosterone concentration at inclusion did not relate to plasma cytokines and injury markers. None of the cytokines changed in plasma after spironolactone intervention. Plasma IL-17A increased in the placebo group. Spironolactone induced an increase in plasma K+ (0.4 ± 0.4 mmol/L). This increase did not correlate with plasma IL-17A or urine calbindin and TFF3 changes. Ongoing treatment at inclusion with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor and/or angiotensin II receptor blockers was not associated with changed levels of IL-17A and injury markers and had no effect on the response to spironolactone. Urinary calbindin and TFF3 decreased in the spironolactone group with no difference in between-group analyses. In conclusion, irrespective of ongoing ANGII inhibition, spironolactone has no effect on plasma IL-17A and related cytokines or urinary injury markers in kidney transplant recipients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.