Aims The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the severity of anaemia on postoperative complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. All patients who underwent primary TKA or THA between January 2012 and December 2017 were identified and stratified based upon hematocrit level. In this analysis, we defined anaemia as packed cell volume (Hct) < 36% for women and < 39% for men, and further stratified anaemia as mild anaemia (Hct 33% to 36% for women, Hct 33% to 39% for men), and moderate to severe (Hct < 33% for both men and women). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the incidence of multiple adverse events within 30 days of arthroplasty. Results Following adjustment, patients in the THA cohort with moderate to severe anaemia had an increased odds of 6.194 (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.679 to 6.756; p < 0.001) for developing any postoperative complication. Following adjustment, patients in the TKA cohort with moderate to severe anaemia had an increased odds of 5.186 (95% CI 4.811 to 5.590; p < 0.001) for developing any postoperative complication. Among both cohorts, as severity increased, there was an increased risk of postoperative complications. Conclusion Preoperative anaemia is a risk factor for complications following primary arthroplasty. There is a significant relationship between the severity of anaemia and the odds of postoperative complications. Patients who had moderate to severe anaemia were at increased risk of developing postoperative complications relative to patients with mild anaemia. When considering elective primary THA or TKA in a moderately or severely anaemic patient, surgeons should strongly consider correcting anaemia prior to surgery if possible. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(4):485–494.
Aims This study used an artificial neural network (ANN) model to determine the most important pre- and perioperative variables to predict same-day discharge in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods Data for this study were collected from the National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from the year 2018. Patients who received a primary, elective, unilateral TKA with a diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis were included. Demographic, preoperative, and intraoperative variables were analyzed. The ANN model was compared to a logistic regression model, which is a conventional machine-learning algorithm. Variables collected from 28,742 patients were analyzed based on their contribution to hospital length of stay. Results The predictability of the ANN model, area under the curve (AUC) = 0.801, was similar to the logistic regression model (AUC = 0.796) and identified certain variables as important factors to predict same-day discharge. The ten most important factors favouring same-day discharge in the ANN model include preoperative sodium, preoperative international normalized ratio, BMI, age, anaesthesia type, operating time, dyspnoea status, functional status, race, anaemia status, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Six of these variables were also found to be significant on logistic regression analysis. Conclusion Both ANN modelling and logistic regression analysis revealed clinically important factors in predicting patients who can undergo safely undergo same-day discharge from an outpatient TKA. The ANN model provides a beneficial approach to help determine which perioperative factors can predict same-day discharge as of 2018 perioperative recovery protocols. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(8):1358–1366.
Background:
Knee arthroscopy may be performed prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with symptomatic degenerative knee changes that do not yet warrant TKA. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the time interval between knee arthroscopy and subsequent primary TKA is associated with increased rates of revision and certain complications following TKA.
Methods:
Data from 2006 to 2017 were collected from a national insurance database. Patients who underwent knee arthroscopy within 1 year prior to primary TKA were identified and stratified into the following cohorts based on stratum-specific likelihood ratio (SSLR) analysis: 0 to 15, 16 to 35, 36 to 43, and 44 to 52 weeks from the time of knee arthroscopy to TKA. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to determine the association between these specific time intervals and rates of revision surgery, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), aseptic loosening, and manipulation under anesthesia.
Results:
In total, 130,128 patients were included in this study; 6,105 (4.7%) of those patients underwent knee arthroscopy within 1 year prior to TKA and 124,023 (95.3%) underwent TKA without any prior knee surgery, including arthroscopy (the control group). Relative to the control group, the likelihood of undergoing revision surgery was significantly greater in patients who underwent knee arthroscopy ≤15 weeks (odds ratio [OR]: 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43 to 2.22; p < 0.001) or 16 to 35 weeks (OR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.42; p = 0.035) prior to TKA. Patients were at significantly increased risk for PJI if knee arthroscopy was done ≤35 weeks prior to TKA, and all 4 time groups that underwent knee arthroscopy within 1 year before TKA were at increased risk for manipulation under anesthesia.
Conclusions:
We found a time-dependent relationship between the timing of knee arthroscopy and complications following TKA, with the prevalence of revision surgery and PJI increasing as knee arthroscopy was performed closer to the time of TKA. This study suggests that an interval of at least 36 weeks should be maintained between the 2 procedures to minimize risks of PJI and revision surgery.
Level of Evidence:
Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.