Purpose: Nivolumab and pembrolizumab are antibodies against the programmeddeath-receptor-1 (PD-1) which are associated with distinct immune related adverse effects (AEs). This meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials aims to summarize current knowledge regarding the toxicity profile of these agents.Methods: PubMed search was conducted in February of 2016. The randomized trials needed to have at least one of the study arms consisting of nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy and a control arm containing no anti-PD-1 therapy. Data were analyzed using random effects meta-analysis for risk ratios. Heterogeneity across studies was analyzed using Q and I
327 Background: The clinical benefit of neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (borderline/unresectable) has not been well established. However, the challenge of managing locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma has led to the incorporation of neoadjuvant treatment into clinical practice. FOLFIRINOX has been increasingly used as neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but may not be well tolerated especially in older patients due to adverse effect profile. In our institution, we have used FOLFOX as an alternative for older patients and patients with poor performance status based on our retrospective observation of FOLFOX in metastatic/advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients from January 1, 2011 to February 28, 2013 treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (FOLFOX/FOLFIRINOX) with the intention of future resection. In addition patients also received neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. Imaging studies, operative notes and Pathology reports were reviewed. Results: 27 patients were analyzed, 10 received FOLFIRINOX and 17 received FOLFOX regimen. Mean age of patients were 57.28 ± 11.68 SD and 68.66± 11.21 SD in the two groups respectively. Patients received 4.2 ± 0.92 SD and 3.59 ±1.06 SD cycles of chemotherapy in FOLFIRINOX and FOLFOX groups respectively. Mean duration of follow up was similar in both groups. 5 patients on FOLFOX and 1 patient on FOLFIRINOX had disease progression thereby precluding surgery. The Rate of R0 resections was 64.7 % and 60% (P 0.27) in the two groups respectively. Overall survival was not statistically significant between the two groups. (Kaplan Meier survival graphs will accompany final presentation). Conclusions: In our study, FOLFIRINOX was administered in younger patients. However the R0 resection rates were similar in both the groups. FOLFOX may be acceptable neoadjuvant chemotherapy of choice in patients with borderline functional status. Randomized trials are needed to define this better.
56 Background: Barrett’s esophagus is a well-known risk factor for esophageal cancer. Surveillance esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and procedures like endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and radio frequency ablation (RFA) are adopted to mitigate risk of evolution to high grade dysplasia and cancer. Newer imaging modalities are expected to improve diagnostic accuracy and guide management. Here we describe our early experience with optical coherence tomography (OCT) which is an near infra-red light imaging technique for diagnosing high grade dysplasia and early stage cancer in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Methods: Patients who underwent EGD and diagnosed with Barrett’s esophagus and endoscopic features worrisome for high grade dysplasia or early cancer were selected for the procedure. Patients underwent OCT for further characterizations of these lesions. Clinical and endoscopic findings, imaging studies and OCT findings were recorded and analyzed. Results: 5 patients were studied in this early series and details are tabulated below. (OCT images will accompany final presentation.) Conclusions: Early detection of high grade lesions and early cancer with image directed therapy in Barrett’s esophagus may positively impact survival. Our early experience suggests OCT is helpful in detecting cryptic dysplastic changes, especially in the aftermath of previous ablation and can guide additional endoscopic treatment. Further studies are necessary to determine efficacy of such an approach. [Table: see text]
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.