No abstract

IntroductionPeriodic Fever, Aphthous Stomatitis, Pharyngitis, Adenitis (PFAPA) is the most common periodic fever syndrome in the pediatric population, yet its pathogenesis is unknown. PFAPA was believed to be sporadic but family clustering has been widely observed.ObjectiveTo identify demographic and clinical differences between patients with PFAPA and a positive family history (FH+) as compared to those with no family history (FH−).MethodsIn a database comprising demographic and clinical data of 273 pediatric PFAPA patients treated at two tertiary centers in Israel, 31 (14.3%) had FH+. Data from patients with FH+ were compared to data from those with FH−. Furthermore, family members (FMs) of those with FH+ were contacted via telephone for more demographic and clinical details.ResultsThe FH+ group as compared to the FH− group had more myalgia (56 vs. 19%, respectively, p = 0.001), headaches (32 vs. 2%, respectively, p = 0.016), and a higher carrier frequency of M694V mutation (54% vs. 25%, respectively, p = 0.05). Colchicine was seen to be a more beneficial treatment for the FH+ group as compared to the FH− group; however, with no statistical significance (p = 0.096). FMs displayed almost identical characteristics to patients in the FH+ group except for greater arthralgia during flares (64 vs. 23%, respectively, p = 0.008), and compared to the FH− group they had more oral aphthae (68 vs. 43%, respectively, p = 0.002), myalgia/arthralgia (64 vs. 19%/16%, respectively, p < 0.0001), and higher rates of FH of Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) (45 vs.15%, respectively, p = 0.003).ConclusionsOur findings suggest that patients with a FH+ likely experience a different subset of disease with higher frequency of family history of FMF, arthralgia, myalgia, and might have a better response to colchicine compared to FH−. Colchicine prophylaxis for PFAPA should be considered in FH+.

Objective It is common knowledge among clinicians who treat PFAPA (Periodic Fever, Aphthous Stomatitis, Pharyngitis, Adenitis) patients that emotional stress can trigger PFAPA attacks similarly to other autoinflammatory diseases. However, it has never been proved scientifically. Our aim was to examine whether emotional stress serves as a trigger for PFAPA attacks. Methods Patients aged 3-12 years, with active PFAPA, from two Israeli medical centers were enrolled to this study. Patient's parents were reached via phone calls in two occasions: a stressful period related to the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions and a less stressful period. In both times they were asked to report occurrence of PFAPA attacks in the preceding 2 weeks. The relative stress levels of the two periods were validated by an emotional distress scale questionnaire. The significance level was set at 0.05. Results Mean age was 7.28 ± 2.7 for the 99 paediatric patients enrolled in the study. Scores for the mean emotional distress questionnaire were statistically significant higher in the stressful period compared to the less stressful period (35.6 ± 8.1 vs. 32.1 ±7.7, respectively, P = 0.047). In the stressful period, 41 (38.7%) reported at least one attack during the preceding 2 weeks, compared to 24 (22.6%) in the less stressful period (p = 0.017). Conclusion PFAPA flares during COVID-19 outbreak are described. This study is the first to suggest that emotional stress is associated with PFAPA attacks.

No abstract

Introduction: PFAPA is the most common periodic fever syndrome in the pediatric population yet pathogenesis is unknown. PFAPA was believed to be sporadic but family clustering has been widely observed.Objective: To identify demographic and clinical differences between patients with PFAPA and a positive family history (FH+) compared to those with PFAPA with no family history (FH-).Methods: In a database comprising demographic and clinical data of 273 pediatric PFAPA patients treated at two tertiary centers in Israel, 31 (14.3%) of patients were PFAPA FH+. Data from patients with FH+ for PFAPA was compared to data from those with FH- of the disorder. Furthermore, family members (FMs) of those with FH+ were contacted via telephone for more demography and clinical details. Results: FH+ group had more headaches (32% vs.2%; p= 0.016), myalgia (56% vs. 19%; p= 0.001), higher carrier frequency of M694V mutation (54% vs. 25%; p=0.053), greater family history of FMF (30% vs. 15%; p=0.096) and better outcomes with colchicine (82% vs. 52%; p=0.096) compared to those with FH-. FMs displayed almost identical characteristics to the FH+ group except for greater arthralgia during flares (64% vs. 23%; p=0.008) and compared to the FH- group, more oral aphthae (68% vs. 43%; p=0.002), myalgia/arthralgia (64% vs. 19%/16%; p<0.0001), and higher rates of FH of FMF (45% vs.15%; p=0.003). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that FH+ likely experience a different subset of disease with higher frequency of family history of FMF, arthralgia, myalgia and better response to colchicine compared to FH-. Colchicine prophylaxis for PFAPA should be considered in FH+.