The tunnels located in the shallow depths of loose saturated sand are significantly prone to liquefaction-induced uplift. Research works are, therefore, in progress to propose efficient techniques for mitigating uplift. In this study, 1 g physical modeling was used to assess the performance of helical piles for decreasing liquefaction-induced uplift. The effects of pile length, number of pile helixes, and the pile spacing in plan view were investigated. The uplift mechanism of the tunnel and helical pile system was also analyzed. The results demonstrate that the penetration of the helical piles into the dense layer underlying the superficial liquefiable sand has decreased tunnel uplift significantly. However, excessive close pile spacing along the tunnel resulted in shear surface interference, and the efficiency of the excessive number of helical piles decreased significantly. The detailed view of the uplift mechanism showed that utilization of the piles extended the transition phase of uplift during shaking. Helical piles can efficiently restrict the possibility of rapid uplift of the tunnel and shorten the duration of the primary uplift phase.
In this research, the effect of acidic and alkaline chemical solutions on the behavior of loessial soil was investigated. To evaluate the severity of acidity and alkalinity of chemicals, two factors sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide were used in the pH of 3, 5, 9, 11. In this research, the effect of acidic and alkaline solutions on the collapse potential, shear strength parameters and unconfined compression of collapsible soils were investigated. Experimental tests results showed that acidic solutions with a low pH increase the collapse potential and effective cohesion of soil and decrease effective internal friction angle; on the other hand, alkaline solutions with a high pH decrease the collapse potential and effective cohesion of the soil and increase effective internal friction angle. The results of unconfined compression tests showed that with increasing the acidity and alkalinity in soil, the undrained strength of the soil decreased. SEM test results showed an increase in soil cavities in acidic solution while the soil cavities were fixed in alkaline solution.
Loessial soil is moisture-sensitive soil susceptible to settle when fully saturated. In this study, efforts were made to investigate the effect of oil pollutants on mechanical behavior of soil. The loess soil was contaminated by 2,4,6,8 and 10% dry weight of lamp oil and gasoline. Atterberg limits, direct shear, unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) tests were performed to evaluate the behavior of oil-contaminated collapsible soils. The results of Atterberg tests showed that the plasticity of the soil decreased, due to the reduction in the thickness of the absorbed surface layer and double water layer. According to the direct shear test, with increasing contamination up to 10% of lamp oil and gasoline, the cohesion of the soil was decreased from 14.5 kPa to 7.3 kPa and 7 kPa, respectively, which was due to the reduction in soil plasticity and diffuse double-layer. Because of the lubrication of soil particles, the internal friction angle of soil was reduced from 18.5° to 13.6° and 13.9° for 10% lamp oil and gasoline. UCS of contaminated soil increased in low strains due to the apparent cohesion of hydrocarbons and it decreased 31% for gasoline and 53% for lamp oil at high strains due to the softening behavior of the contaminated soil. SEM test revealed that hydrocarbons covered the soil particles and changed the soil fabrication to dispersed skeleton. Generally, collapsible soil contaminated with different lamp oil and gasoline contents showed a decrease in shear strength and UCS with increasing oil content.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.