No abstract

The Rolimeter is as reproducible and reliable as the KT-1000 arthrometer. It offers a valid method for the measurement of anteroposterior translation in the knee. Higher accuracy was obtained at 20 degrees of flexion for the KT-1000 arthrometer and at 80 degrees of flexion for the Rolimeter.

A total of 61 patients with a proximal humeral fracture was treated between January 1996 and March 1998 by closed reduction and fracture fixation with intramedullary Prévot (or Nancy) nails. Of these, 28 female and 25 male patients with a mean age of 52 years (range 3-91 years) were reviewed clinically and radiologically with a mean follow-up of 17 months (range 4-30 months). The mean Constant score was 63, the mean Neer score 74 and the mean visual analogue scale (VAS) 73. The 14 patients under 24 years old achieved a Constant score of 86, a Neer score of 99 and a VAS of 97, while 13 patients aged between 25 and 60 years had a Constant score of 67, a Neer score of 75 and a VAS of 71. The 26 patients older than 61 years had a Constant score of 48, a Neer score of 61 and a VAS of 61. One patient with total and 6 with partial humeral head necrosis as well as 5 pseudarthroses were noted. Proximal nail perforation of the humeral head due to fracture collapse was seen in 22 cases. Complications were more frequently observed in the elderly. End results were not related to the type of fracture. This minimally invasive technique decreases the rate of occurrence of avascular necrosis of the humeral head. However, fractures are not sufficiently stabilised, mainly because of bone loss induced by impaction and osteoporosis. Bone loss remains an unsolved problem, and alternative methods such as the use of bone substitute combined with minimally invasive techniques should be studied.

The survival rate for the Ledoux prosthesis was 58.9% at 16 months and for the de la Caffinière implant 66.4% at 68 months. Loosening occurred in 15% of the Ledoux stems, in 46% of the Ledoux cups, in 24% of the de la Caffinière stems and in 28% of the de la Caffinière cups.Both prostheses behaved similarly, and it is clear that a constrained ball-and-socket prosthesis is not suitable for the trapeziometacarpal joint.

We treated 43 patients (38 women and 5 men) with osteoarthritis of the basal joint of the thumb by non-cemented arthroplasty of the first carpometacarpal joint as described by Ledoux. The probability of a patient avoiding revision for 12 months was 62% and for 16 months 59%. The indications for revision were aseptic loosening in 83% and luxation in 17%.The surviving prostheses were reviewed clinically and radiologically at a mean follow-up of 25.3 months. Pain on loading, movement or at rest was seen in 75% of the patients. There was significant reduction in the range of movement of the trapeziometacarpal joint and of wrist strength. Radiological assessment showed significant subsidence of the stem in the first metacarpal and migration of the cup, with the stem loose in 15% and the cup in 46%.We no longer recommend this method of joint replacement.