Plasma levels of amitriptyline and nortriptyline were measured twice weekly in 62 patients treated for three weeks with i.m. amitriptyline 120 mg/day. In half the patients the ratio of amitriptyline to nortriptyline was under 1 and in the other half it was greater than 1. 30 of these 62 patients were clinically monitored with the Hamilton Rating Scale and the side effects of the drug were recorded. There was no correlation between plasma level of the drug and its side effects, but there was a statistically significant curvilinear correlation between the plasma levels of amitriptyline plus nortriptyline and nortriptyline alone, and the clinical effect. The practical value of this type of investigation was demonstrated by showing that patients whose drug plasma level was not in the therapeutic range, were clinically improved after adjustment of the dose. The plasma level of amitriptyline plus nortriptyline must lie between 60 to 220 ng/ml, and that of nortriptyline between 60 to 140 ng/ml, to obtain the best clinical effect. Associated treatments, age, weight and sex of patients, and the type of depression did not appear significantly to affect the plasma level of the drug.
Thirty one in-patients suffering from depression were treated orally with clomipramine (C1) at various dosage, for 28 days, after a "wash-out" period of three days. In 17 patients receiving 75 mg per day of C1, steady state plasma levels of C1 were reached at Day 14, and steady state plasma levels of its active metabolite, desmethylclomipramine (DMC1), were reached at Day 21. In contrast, in 7 other patients receiving a dosage increasing to 150 mg per day at Day 7, mean plasma levels of C1 and DMC1 continued to rise during the entire treatment period. At the steady state, a correlation was found between C1 dosage expressed as mg kg body weight and the plasma concentration of C1 and DMC1. Factors such as tobacco and alcohol consumption seem to modify the C1/DMC1 ratio. A comparison of clinical response with plasma levels of C1, DMC1 and C1 + DMC1 showed a significant negative linear correlation.
After a review of a pharmacokinetic interaction between tricyclic antidepres-sants (TCA) and fluoxetine the authors report their own data. They confirm the existence of an interaction of TCA with fluoxetine, in clinical practice, but the fluoxetine was not associated in all cases with a marked increase of TCA plasma levels. The increase appeared especially high with clomipramine (n = 4) and imipramine (n = 3), and lower or dose-dependent with amitriptyline (n= 4). The pharmacokinetic change did not induce side effects in the patients, even when the total TCA plasma level increased to 965 (clomipramine) or 785 (imipramine) ng/ml. The authors then discuss the clinical implication and the possible mechanism of action.
The urinary excretion of amitriptyline (AMT) and seven of its metabolites was studied by mass spectrometry in 10 depressive in-patients treated to steady-state condition with oral amitriptyline. An average of 68.3% of the dose was recovered in the urine, of which 68.6% was present as conjugates. Hydroxynortriptyline and its conjugate represented 54% of the total recovery. There was marked variation in metabolite pattern between patients. The variations were not due to concomitant medication with benzodiazepines. There was no correlation between the plasma and urine concentrations of AMT and its metabolites, except for amitriptyline conjugates. Two groups of patients could be distinguished - low and high excretors, who displayed alternative routes of metabolism. The disappearance rate of AMT from plasma was determined by the metabolic clearance of AMT to its metabolites. It varied considerably between patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.