Potato cyst nematodes (PCN) have been known to occur in the UK for nearly a hundred years. They are the most problematic pests of potatoes and can cause severe yield losses. Previous work has shown the two species, Globodera rostochiensis and G. pallida, to be distributed throughout the UK. This paper reports the results of the first structured and statistically unbiased survey undertaken to assess their occurrence and distribution in the potato growing land of England and Wales. The survey showed that PCN were present in 64% of sites sampled. Of the populations found, 67% were G. pallida, 8% were G. rostochiensis and 25% contained both species. The results show an increase in the incidence of PCN since previous studies were completed and confirm the perceived shift towards G. pallida as the predominant species. Of the infestations found, 62% had a population density of less than 10 eggs g -1 soil.
Effective management of potato cyst nematodes (PCNs) requires simple, rapid and accurate identification and quantification of field populations. Soil samples from a survey of 484 fields in potato rotations in England and Wales were used to compare the identification and quantification of PCNs using IEF, PCR, ELISA and bait plant tests. The cyst counts and bait plant test revealed that 64.3% of field samples contained PCNs. Bait plant tests increased the detection rate of PCNs in field samples by 4-6.4%. This means that some infestations are cryptic and would not normally be detected by standard counts. IEF, PCR and ELISA methods distinguished between Globodera rostochiensis and G pallida and were able to register mixed populations; however they were not in full agreement. All methods suggested that G pallida is the dominant species in the field samples tested. The PCR results indicated that 66% of field samples contained pure G pallida, 8% contained pure G rostochiensis and 26% contained mixtures of the two species. Estimates of the relative process times taken per sample in the PCR, IEF and ELISA techniques are given.
SummaryThe two species of the potato cyst nematodes (PCN) Globodera pallida and G rostochiensis are the most problematic pests of the potato crop in the UK. There are no commercially available cultivars with full resistance to G. pallida and both crop rotation and granular nematicides are less effective at controlling this species than G. rostochiensis. In situations of very high PCN levels it may be possible to reduce populations and yield losses by using an autumn application of the soil fumigant 1,3‐dichloropropene (1,3‐D) followed by a spring application of a granular nematicide. Two field experiments were done to look at the integration of methods for the control of PCN. The Common Field experiment (G. rostochiensis infested) compared the use of 1,3‐D with the granular nematicides aldicarb, oxamyl and fosthiazate when growing the susceptible cv. Estima. The Four Gates experiment (infested with both PCN species but mainly G rostochiensis) compared the performance of cv. Santé (partially resistant to G. pallida, fully resistant to G. rostochiensis) with that of the susceptible cv. Estima when treated with 1,3‐D and oxamyl at full and half‐rates. The results of the experiments show that an integrated approach to nematode control on heavily infested sites, including granular and fumigant nematicides and cultivar resistance, can lead to significant decreases in nematode population densities and reduce yield losses. An economic evaluation of the experiments modelled the gross margins from the different nematicide treatments. In Common Field, the highest gross margins were achieved with the combined use of fumigant and granular nematicides. In Four Gates, there was a clear economic benefit for both cultivars from the use of 1,3‐D. In this experiment, oxamyl was of economic value to Estima but not to Sante and full‐rate oxamyl was of more benefit than half‐rate to Estima.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.