No abstract

The DOBRE project investigated the interplay of geologic and geodynamic processes that controlled the evolution of the Donbas fold belt, Ukraine, as an example of an inverted intracratonic rift basin. A deep seismic reflection profile provides an excellent image of the structure of the Donbas fold belt, which is the uplifted and compressionally deformed part of the late Paleozoic Pripyat-Dniepr-Donets basin. Both the effects of rifting and those of later structural inversion are recognized in the seismic and geologic data. The interpretation of the reflection data shows that the inversion of the Donbas fold belt occurred at the crustal scale as a mega-pop-up, which involved a major detachment fault through the entire crust and an associated back thrust. The DOBREflection image provides a simple concept of intracratonic basin inversion, the crustal pop-up being uplifted and internally deformed. The association of such a structure with inverted intracratonic basins such as the Donbas fold belt implies brittle deformation of relatively cold crust.

The southern part of the Eastern European continental landmass consists mainly of a thick platform of Vendian and younger sediments overlying Precambrian basement, referred to as the East European and Scythian platforms (EEP and SP). Some specific geological features, such as the Late Devonian Pripyat-Dniepr-Donets rift basin, the Karpinsky Swell, the Permo(?)-Triassic troughs of the SP, and the deformed belt running from Dobrogea to Crimea and the Greater Caucasus, in which rocks as old as Palaeozoic crop out, form a record of the geodynamic processes affecting this part of the European lithosphere. Hard constraints on the Palaeozoic history of the SP are very sparse. The conventional view has been that the SP is a Late Palaeozoic orogenic belt. However, it is shown that the few available data are also consistent with an alternative interpretation in which it is the thinned margin of the Precambrian continent, reworked by Late Palaeozoic-Early Mesozoic rifting events. The geodynamic setting of the margin is classically reported as one of active convergence throughout the Late Palaeozoic and Early Mesozoic, with subduction of the Palaeotethys Ocean beneath Europe. Actually, there are no direct observations constraining the polarity of Palaeotethys subduction in this area although indirect evidence is not inconsistent with the conventional model. In such a case, the sedimentary-tectonic record of the SP suggests that convergence during the Permo-Triassic(?) and certainly during the Early and Mid-Jurassic was oblique. An Eo-Cimmerian (Late Triassic-Early Jurassic) event is widespread and implies a tectonic compressional regime with systematic inversion of most sedimentary basins. There is also a widespread unconformity at the end of the Mid-Jurassic and in the Late Jurassic. These can be interpreted as indicators of compressional tectonics; however, nowhere is there evidence of intense shortening or other orogenic processes. A revised tectonic model is proposed for the area but, given the degree of uncertainty characterizing the geology of this area, it is best considered as a basis for further discussion.

Three fundamental stages of the Cretaceous–Neogene tectonic evolution of the Odessa Shelf and Azov Sea (northern margins of western and eastern Black Sea basins, respectively) have been documented from the analysis of reinterpreted regional seismic profiling and one-dimensional (1-D) subsidence analysis of 49 wells, for which the stratigraphic interpretation was recently revised. (1) An initial active rifting stage began within the Early Cretaceous (not later than Aptian–Albian times) and continued until the end of the Santonian in the Late Cretaceous (c. 128–83 Ma). A system of half-grabens with mainly south-dipping normal faults developed on the Odessa Shelf at this time. The most profound faulting, accompanied by volcanic activity, occurred in the NE–SW orientated Karkinit-Gubkin rift basin at the boundary between the Eastern European and Scythian platforms. The footwalls of half-grabens were exposed above sea level and subject to erosion at this time. Active extensional processes affected the western part of Azov Sea and, while the onset and cessation of these cannot be tightly constrained, they are compatible with the well constrained results from the Odessa Shelf. (2) The second tectonic stage is one of passive post-rift thermal subsidence that lasted from the Campanian (Late Cretaceous) until the end of the Middle Eocene (83–38.6 Ma). (3) The third stage of basin evolution is one of inversion tectonics in a compressional setting. Discrete inversion events occurred at the end of the Middle Eocene, during the Late Eocene, during the Early Miocene and at Middle Miocene times (c. 38.6 Ma, c. 35.4 Ma, c. 16.3 Ma, c. 10.4 Ma, respectively) and typical inversion structures developed on the Odessa Shelf, some parts of which were uplifted and significantly eroded (down to the Lower Cretaceous succession). The southern part of the Azov Sea, opening into the northernmost eastern Black Sea basin, subsided rapidly during this time; thereafter, until the Quaternary, rapid subsidence was limited to its southeastern part, which was incorporated into the Indolo-Kuban foreland basin of the Greater Caucasus orogen.

No abstract

The (Mid-) Late Devonian to Early Carboniferous was a time of widespread rifting on the East European Craton (EEC) and its margins. The most prominent basin among these and, accordingly, the best documented is the Dniepr-Donets Basin (DDB) in Ukraine and southern Russia. The DDB is associated with voluminous rift-related magmatism and broad basement uplift. Two other large, extensional, basin systems developed along the margins of the EEC at the same time: the East Barents Basin (EEB) and its onshore prolongation the Timan-Pechora Basin (TPB), and the Peri-Caspian Basin (PCB). Rifting, associated magmatism, and possible domal basement uplift are also reported elsewhere within the EEC, suggesting a common, 'active', rifting process, involving a cluster of thermal instabilities (or generalized thermal instability) at the base of the lithosphere beneath widely separated parts of the EEC by Mid-Late Devonian times. The DDB is an intracratonic rift basin, cutting across the Archaean-Palaeoproterozoic structural grain of its basement and, as such, differs from the EBB -TPB and PCB, which are pericratonic rift basins developed on reworked and juvenile crystalline basement accreted to the EEC during the Neoproterozoic. The DDB opened into a deep basin, possibly having oceanic lithospheric affinity, to the SE, in the area where it adjoins the southern PCB, suggesting the possibility that rifting led to (limited?) continental break-up in this area at this time. Post-rift compressional tectonic reactivations and basin inversion in the DDB, leading to the formation of its prominent Donbas Foldbelt segment, are related to Tethyan events (Cimmerian and Alpine orogenies) occurring on the nearby southern margin of the EEC. Post-rift compressional inversions in the PCB and TPB, which lie closer to the Urals margin of the EEC, are related to Uralian tectonics.

Th is paper presents the author's integrated regional studies during the last decade. Th e main purpose is to present an overall understanding of the geological structure, sedimentary basins and hydrocarbon systems of the whole Western Black Sea Zone (WBSZ). Th is study is based on original data from boreholes, seismic and gravity-magnetic surveys and hydrocarbon accumulations.Many geophysical borehole data obtained for WBSZ during the last 3-4 decades were interpreted mostly at a national level using diff erent approaches, terminology and nomenclature for the same or similar lithostratigraphic and tectonic units. Th erefore, a unifi ed approach to interpretation of borehole-seismic data and correlation of stratigraphic, sedimentological and tectonic units has a key importance for overall clarifi cation of the deep geological structure and the hydrocarbon challenges.A set of regional geological cross-sections along good quality basic seismic lines and basic boreholes was constructed. A detailed tectonic map of the WBSZ has been compiled by integrated interpretation of seismic borehole and gravitymagnetic data. Th e defi nition of hydrocarbon systems and promising exploration trends is made by source rock assessment, Oil-Oil and Oil-Source rock correlations, analyses of the reservoir/seal pairs and the hydrocarbon migration and accumulation. Genetic correlations are based on many Rock-Eval, Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) and carbon isotope analyses.Th e complex geological structure of the WBSZ is defi ned by four groups of tectonic units: (1) Western Black Sea basin (WBSB) -its western zone with the Kamchia and the Histria westward wedging branches (sub-basins); (2) portions of the Moesian, Scythian and East European platforms; (3) fragments of the North Dobrogea, Eastern Balkan, Eastern Srednogorie and Strandzha orogens; (4) Burgas and Babadag basins.Four diff erent oil genetic types have been identifi ed. Th ree main hydrocarbon systems with economic potential are defi ned, they relate to: WBSB and its Histria and Kamchia branches, the East-Varna trough and the Bourgas basin. Conceptual models for hydrocarbon systems and their prospect exploration trends are constructed.

The Donbas Fold Belt is the compressionally deformed southeasternmost part of the intracratonic late Paleozoic Dniepr‐Donets rift basin. It is situated in an intracratonic setting but close to the southern margin of the East European Craton, south of which lies the Scythian Platform. A range of igneous rocks from the Donbas Fold Belt and the Scythian Platform were dated by the 40Ar/39Ar method in order to constrain the ages of magmatic activity in these areas, and compare them. The plateau ages from the south margin of the Donbas Fold Belt vary from 151.4 ± 4.7 Ma to 278.1 ± 5.3 Ma, and define three main age groups: Middle‐Late Jurassic, Middle‐Late Triassic, and Early Permian. The age spectra obtained from the Scythian Platform samples are often disturbed as a result of limited alteration. The proposed ages (plateau and pseudoplateau) vary from 174.4 ± 2.1 Ma to 243.7 ± 1.4 Ma, and two major age groups are defined, in Early Carboniferous and Triassic/Jurassic times. The Early Permian (285–270 Ma) and Early Triassic (245–250 Ma) ages of magmatic activity are the same in both areas; in the Late Triassic, the ages of magmatic activity are slightly different (220 and 205 Ma), and they are entirely different thereafter. These data can be interpreted as indicating a mantle plume as common deep magmatic source.