Introduction In heart transplant recipients, nonadherence is associated with higher risk of morbidity and mortality. Research Question Can a psychoeducational intervention enhance adherence to medical recommendations? Design We randomized 200 patients awaiting heart transplantation on the high urgency wait list to a manualized psychoeducational intervention or standard care. Follow-up continued to three years after transplantation. Primary endpoint was adherence to immunosuppressive medication, assessed at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months posttransplant. Secondary endpoints were barriers to adherence during follow-up and clinical outcomes, including cardiac rejection within the first postoperative year and postoperative 3-year mortality. Results Fifty patients died before or within the first 3 months of transplantation. The primary endpoint was analyzed in 66 patients in the intervention group and 66 in the control group. Both study groups showed almost maximal adherence to immunosuppressive medication throughout follow-up, with no significant time x treatment interaction (P>0.99). Likewise, there was no significant time x treatment interaction ( P=0.41) on barriers to adherence. The percentage of patients with International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation standard grade 1 and 2 rejection was in the intervention and control groups 82.5% and 78.7%, respectively, and 8.8% and 13.1%, respectively, without significant differences between study groups ( P=0.75). Considering all randomized and transplanted patients in the intervention group (N=85) and control group (N=87), postoperative 3-year mortality was 29.4% and 27.6%, respectively ( P=0.82). Conclusions Adherence to immunosuppressive medication was high, even without a complex, manualized psychoeducational intervention. The intervention had no significant positive impact on cardiac rejection and mortality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.