This study gives a systematic understanding for patient radiation exposure in endovascular and hybrid revascularization of the lower extremities, thus far absent in the literature.
Objectives: Constantly increasing number of procedures performed - endovascular or hybrid in patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease during the last decades finds its explanation in the lower morbidity and mortality rates, compared to bypass surgery. The purpose of the current survey was to estimate patients’ radiation exposure in aortoiliac segment after endovascular or hybrid revascularization and to study the main factors which have direct contribution. Methods: A retrospective study of 285 procedures conducted with the help of a mobile C-arm system in 223 patients was performed. Procedures were grouped according to criteria such as: type of intervention, vascular access, level of complexity and operating team. Different analyses were performed within the groups and dose values. Results: The median values of kerma-air-product (KAP), the number of series and the peak skin dose (PSD) significantly increase with the increasing number of vascular accesses: for one access (16.68 Gy.cm2, 6 and 336 mGy), for 2 (56.93 Gy.cm2, 11 and 545 mGy), and for 3 (102.28 Gy.cm2, 15 and 781 mGy). Significant dependence was observed in the case of single access site between the type of access and the dose values: hybrid and retrograde common femoral artery/superficial femoral artery (CFA/SFA) endovascular accesses, 10.06 Gy.cm2/301 mGy and 13.23 Gy.cm2/318 mGy respectively, in contrast with the contralateral CFA and left brachial access, 33 Gy.cm2/421 mGy and 38.33 Gy.cm2/448 mGy respectively. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that the most important factors increasing the dose values are number and type of vascular accesses, followed by the combination and number of implanted stents with the complexity of the procedure. The PSD values for a single procedure were between 2 and 12 times lower than those IAEA proposed as trigger levels for radiation-induced erythema. This study shows that trigger levels were not reached even for patients with repeated procedures in the same segment in one year period. Advances in knowledge: The study gives important understanding and clarity on the growing awareness for dose-modifying factors during endovascular and hybrid revascularization of aortoiliac segment.
An Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) is a localized dilatation and weakening of the abdominal aorta, as it`s infrarenal part is most commonly affected by the disease. Risk of rupture: Size of the AAA is one of the strongest predictors of rupture, as aortic aneurysms above 5,5cm in diameter have a higher risk. Clinical manifestation: Most of the AAAs have no symptoms and are accidently found. Classis symptoms of ruptured AAA (rAAA) are suddenly occurring severe abdominal and/or back pain, arterial hypotension and pulsatile abdominal mass. Preoperative management: When rAAA is suspected, the patient should be consulted with a vascular surgeon as soon as possible. Aggressive fluid resuscitation should be avoided. Surgical treatment: Open surgery is usually performed via a transperitoneal approach with a midline laparotomy. Depending on the anatomy of the AAA and iliac arteries involvement an aorto-arotal or aorto-bifemoral bypass is constructed. Complications after repair of rAAA: Local - Lower limb(s) ischemia, Ischemia of the colon; Systemic - Cardiac, Pulmonary, Renal, Liver or Multiorgan failure, with 30-day mortality reaching up to 89%.CASE REPORT: Male patient, 81 years of age, with multiple concomitant diseases. He was diagnosed with AAA 4 months prior to the rupture. The maximal diameter of the AAA was 15,6cm, iliac arteries were not affected. The patient refused the suggested surgical or endovascular treatments. He presented at ER 4 months later with acute pain in the abdomen and back. Clinical status: severe pain in the abdomen, BP 96/57mmHg, Hgb 102 g/l with HCT -0.331 l/l. On the CT-angiography rupture of AAA was verified with massive retroperitoneal haematoma, occluded right renal artery and aneurysm of the left renal artery. Median laparotomy was conducted under common anaesthesia. Aneurysmal neck was clamped above renal arteries, with clamping time – 30 minutes. After reclamping aorto-bifemoral bypass was constructed. Postoperatively the patient was transferred to intensive care unit (ICU). In the course of ICU treatment, the patient was inadequate and lacked spontaneous diuresis. A temporary catheter for haemodialysis was placed and such was initiated. He was transferred in the Clinic of vascular surgery after stabilizing blood oxygen saturation. The patient was inadequate at the time of transfer, with jaundice present. The patient restored bowel passage, hepatoprotectors were administered and physiotherapy was initiated. On the 20th postoperative day, the patient had a rapid decline in the physical status, demonstrated by hypotonia, bradycardia and regardless of the reanimation, died.DISCUSSION: Ruptured aneurysm of abdominal aorta has high mortality. Despite the immediate surgical treatment and adequate substitution, the patient had lethal outcome. CONCLUSION: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm has high 30-day mortality, ranging between 22,9%-65,9%. In cases of acute renal and/or liver failure following the surgical treatment and when haemodialysis is needed, mortality rate can reach up to 89%.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.