BACKGROUND:Patients with metastatic poorly differentiated endocrine carcinoma (PDEC) usually have a short survival. The chemotherapy combination of cisplatin and etoposide is frequently used as first-line palliative chemotherapy. There are, however, no published studies concerning second-line treatment of the disease. Temozolomide has shown clinical effect in well-differentiated endocrine carcinomas. This study was performed to evaluate the effect of temozolomide in PDEC patients who had progressed on first-line treatment. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with PDEC (mainly gastrointestinal) were treated with temozolomide alone or in combination with capecitabine. A subset of patient also received bevacizumab. MGMT methylation was analyzed in tissue specimens. Data were collected retrospectively. RESULTS: One patient had a complete response, and 7 patients had partial response (33% response rate). Median duration of response was 19 months. Another 9 (38%) patients had a stable disease, after progression at inclusion, with a median duration of 18 months. Median progression-free survival for all patients was 6 months, and median overall survival was 22 months. Only 1 patient had a MGMT methylation. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with temozolomide alone or in combination with capecitabine and bevacizumab resulted in objective response or stabilization in 71% of PDEC patients who failed on first-line chemotherapy. These results indicated that temozolomide may be used as second-line treatment in PDEC. Cancer 2011;117:4617-

Background:Socioeconomic status (SES) and social support influences cancer survival. If SES and social support affects cancer treatment has not been thoroughly explored.Methods:A cohort consisting of all patients who were initially diagnosed with or who developed metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC, n=781) in three Scandinavian university hospitals from October 2003 to August 2006 was set up. Clinical and socioeconomic data were registered prospectively.Results:Patients living alone more often had synchronous metastases at presentation and were less often treated with combination chemotherapy than those cohabitating (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04–0.85, P=0.03). Surgical removal of metastases was less common in patients living alone (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10–0.86, P=0.02) but more common among university-educated patients (HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.10–4.49, P=0.02). Smoking, being married and having children did not influence treatment or survival. Median survival was 7.7 months in patients living alone and 11.7 months in patients living with someone (P<0.001). Living alone remained a prognostic factor for survival after correction for age and comorbidity.Conclusion:Patients living alone received less combination chemotherapy and less secondary surgery. Living alone is a strong independent risk factor for poor survival in mCRC.