No abstract

SummaryThe intracellular distribution of the enzyme 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) and 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein (FLAP) in resting and ionophore-activated human leukocytes has been determined using immuno-electronmicroscopic labeling of ultrathin frozen sections and subcellular fractionation techniques. 5-LO is a 78-kD protein that catalyzes the conversion ofarachidonic acid to leukotrienes. FLAP is an 18-kD membrane bound protein that is essential for leukotriene synthesis in cells. In response to ionophore stimulation, 5-LO translocates from a soluble to a sedimentable fraction of cell homogenates. In activated leukocytes, both FLAP and 5-LO were localized in the lumen of the nuclear envelope. Neither protein could be detected in any other cell compartment or along the plasma membrane. In resting cells, the FLAP distribution was identical to that observed in activated cells . In addition, subcellular fractionation techniques showed >83% of immunoblot-detectable FLAP protein and -64% of the FLAP ligand binding activity was found in the nuclear membrane fraction. A fractionation control demonstrated that a plasma membrane marker, detected by a monoclonal antibody PMN13F6, was not detectable in the nuclear membrane fraction . In contrast to FLAP, 5-LO in resting cells could not be visualized along the nuclear envelope. Except for weak labeling of the euchromatin region of the nucleus, 5-LO could not be readily detected in any other cellular compartment . These results demonstrate that the nuclear envelope is the intracellular site at which 5-LO and FLAP act to metabolize arachidonic acid, and that ionophore activation of neutrophils and monocytes results in the translocation of 5-LO from a nonsedimentable location to the nuclear envelope .eukotrienes are products of arachidonic acid metabolism that are produced by leukocytes and that have a variety of effects on the immune system (1) . The enzyme 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO, 1 EC 1.13 .11.12) catalyzes two key steps in the leukotriene biosynthetic pathway (2, 3). These steps are the oxygenation ofarachidonate to 5-(S)-hydroperoxy-6,8, 11,14-eicosatetraenoic acid (5-HPETE), followed by its dehydrogenation, which results in the formation of the unstable epoxide LTA4. In neutrophils the enzyme LTA4 hydrolase then converts LTA4 to LTB4, which is a potent chemotactic and activating factor for neutrophils and eosinophils (4-6). In eo-1 Abbreviations used in this paper. FLAP, 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein; GAM, goat anti-mouse IgG; GAR, goat anti-rabbit IgG ; 5-HPETE, 5-(S)-hydroperoxy-6,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic acid; 5-LO, 5-lipoxygenase; LSM, lymphocyte separation medium ; PLP, paraformaldehyde-lysineperiodate . sinophils and mast cells, LTA4 can also be converted to LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4, all of which stimulate contraction of vascular and bronchial smooth muscle (7,8), resulting in effects on local circulation and bronchoconstriction . These potent biological effects implicate leukotrienes in a number of hypersensitivity and inflammatory disorders, including asthma and in...

The chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4 act synergistically with CD4 in an ordered multistep mechanism to allow the binding and entry of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). The efficiency of such a coordinated mechanism depends on the spatial distribution of the participating molecules on the cell surface. Immunoelectron microscopy was performed to address the subcellular localization of the chemokine receptors and CD4 at high resolution. Cells were fixed, cryoprocessed, and frozen; 80-nm cryosections were double labeled with combinations of CCR5, CXCR4, and CD4 antibodies and then stained with immunogold. Surprisingly, CCR5, CXCR4, and CD4 were found predominantly on microvilli and appeared to form homogeneous microclusters in all cell types examined, including macrophages and T cells. Further, while mixed microclusters were not observed, homogeneous microclusters of CD4 and the chemokine receptors were frequently separated by distances less than the diameter of an HIV-1 virion. Such distributions are likely to facilitate cooperative interactions with HIV-1 during virus adsorption to and penetration of human leukocytes and have significant implications for development of therapeutically useful inhibitors of the entry process. Although the mechanism underlying clustering is not understood, clusters were observed in small trans-Golgi vesicles, implying that they were organized shortly after synthesis and well before insertion into the cellular membrane. Chemokine receptors normally act as sensors, detecting concentration gradients of their ligands and thus providing directional information for cellular migration during both normal homeostasis and inflammatory responses. Localization of these sensors on the microvilli should enable more precise monitoring of their environment, improving efficiency of the chemotactic process. Moreover, since selectins, some integrins, and actin are also located on or in the microvillus, this organelle has many of the major elements required for chemotaxis.Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) therapies have been highly successful in slowing disease progression, increasing health and well-being, and prolonging life. However, viral resistance is now becoming common, and since most existing drugs target only two viral proteins, reverse transcriptase and protease, cross-resistance is a significant problem. One solution to the issue of resistance is development of new complementary therapies based on novel mechanisms of action. The discovery that the chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4, in addition to CD4, are required for viral entry not only furthered understanding of the fusion and infection process but provided two new targets for therapeutic intervention (3,12,14,17,18,22,44).The entry mechanism as currently understood is an ordered process in which the viral envelope protein, gp120, following interaction with CD4, undergoes a conformational change allowing binding to the appropriate chemokine receptor, CCR5 for macrophagetropic or R5 strains, and CXCR4 for T-celltropic or X4 s...

We used antibodies against the alpha subunits of the human fibronectin receptor (FNR) and vitronectin receptor (VNR) to localize simultaneously FNR and VNR at major substrate adhesion sites of fibroblasts and melanoma cells with double-label immunofluorescence microscopy. In early (2-6-h) serum-containing cultures, both FNR and VNR coaccumulated in focal contacts detected by interference reflection microscopy. Under higher resolution immunoscanning electron microscopy, FNR and VNR were also observed to be distributed randomly on the dorsal cell surface. As fibronectin-containing extracellular matrix fibers accumulated beneath the cells at 24 h, FNR became concentrated at contacts with these fibers and was no longer detected at focal contacts. VNR was not observed at matrix contacts but remained strikingly localized in focal contacts of the 24-h cells. Since focal contacts represent the sites of strongest cell-to-substrate adhesion, these results suggest that FNR and VNR together play critical roles in the maintenance of stable contacts between the cell and its substrate. In addition, the accumulation of FNR at extracellular matrix contacts implies that this receptor might also function in the process of cellular migration along fibronectin-containing matrix cables. To define the factors governing accumulation of FNR and VNR at focal contacts, fibroblasts in serum-free media were plated on substrates coated with purified ligands. Fibronectin-coated surfaces fostered accumulation of FNR but not VNR at focal contacts. On vitronectin- coated surfaces, or substrata derivatized with a tridecapeptide containing the cell attachment sequence Arg-Gly-Asp, both FNR and VNR became concentrated at focal contacts. These observations suggest that the availability of ligand is critical to the accumulation of FNR and VNR at focal contacts, and that FNR might also recognize substrate- bound vitronectin.

Cell division of Escherichia coli is inhibited when the SulA protein is induced in response to DNA damage as part of the SOS checkpoint control system. The SulA protein interacts with the tubulin-like FtsZ division protein. We investigated the effects of purified SulA upon FtsZ. SulA protein inhibits the polymerization and the GTPase activity of FtsZ, while point mutant SulA proteins show little effect on either of these FtsZ activities. SulA did not inhibit the polymerization of purified FtsZ2 mutant protein, which was originally isolated as insensitive to SulA. These studies define polymerization assays for FtsZ which respond to an authentic cellular regulator. The observations presented here support the notion that polymerization of FtsZ is central to its cellular role and that direct, reversible inhibition of FtsZ polymerization by SulA may account for division inhibition.