We present a 21-year-old woman with a short history of pelvic pain. The history was unremarkable apart from that of undergoing a surgical termination of pregnancy (TOP) some three-and-half years ago. Examination revealed a foreign body at the cervical os. Subsequent investigations revealed more foreign bodies within the cervical canal and uterine cavity, which were removed. Histologically these were found to be bones. Removal of the bone fragment initially discovered lead to an improvement of symptoms. Although the patient was treated for pelvic-inflammatory disease, no infective cause could be established. The condition of intrauterine retained fetal bones is recognized, but rare. Patients experiencing pelvic pain usually present sooner after TOP than did this patient. Although rare, it is an important condition to diagnose as it represents a treatable cause of infertility.

This study assesses the prevalence and correlates of pearly penile papules (PPP) in two non-genitourinary (GU) medicine male cohorts (<25 and >50 years). PPP were categorised in 188 university students (<25 years), based on self-examination, and 70 patients (>50 years), based on clinician examination. PPP were categorised from 1 to 4, based on increasing papule size and distribution. An anonymous questionnaire was used to identify associations with PPP prevalence. The prevalence of PPP was 38.3% in <25 years, and 11.4% in >50 years (P < 0.001). The prevalence of categories 3 and 4 PPP was 8.5% in <25 years, and 1.4% in >50 years (P < 0.05). In the younger age group, the prevalence of PPP was 26.5% in circumcised participants, and 42.4% in uncircumcised participants (P < 0.05), but was unrelated to either frequency of sexual intercourse or time since first sexual intercourse. In conclusion, PPP disappear with age, and any PPP in patients >50 years are less marked than those in patients <25 years. Patients should be advised accordingly. PPP are less prevalent in circumcised men. Patients could be advised to wear the foreskin rolled back - this may maximize exposure of the coronal area to normal abrasion, which may hasten PPP regression.

Increasing screening frequency in men who have sex with men (MSM) engaging in high-risk behaviours can reduce prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). This evaluation investigated the impact of applying stricter screening guidelines for MSM on service workload and earlier STI diagnoses. A validated risk assessment tool (RAT) was distributed to MSM attending a level 3 sexual health service over three months. Australian screening guidelines were applied to the data to identify MSM requiring more frequent screening and data projected to the larger MSM population. The RAT identified a 2-5-fold increase in the number of STI and HIV screenings required based on six- and three-monthly screening intervals, respectively, in the MSM cohort. When screening intervals are reduced from three-monthly to six-monthly there is a potential loss of 66.7% of earlier HIV diagnoses. The use of RATs will increase workload in sexual health services, but potentially diagnose a large proportion of disease earlier.

The ability to control hospital-acquired infections is highly dependent upon control of cross-contamination from health-care workers to patients, and from one anatomical area of the patient to another anatomical area. Hand hygiene has been demonstrated to be an essential prerequisite in preventing cross-contamination. Wearing gloves does not afford complete protection against cross-contamination. Hand hygiene includes handwashing between patients, the use of alcohol-based skin cleansers and changing or removing gloves between examining different anatomical sites. There are no previously published audits regarding compliance to hand hygiene in genitourinary (GU) medicine clinics. A validated observation tool was employed in this audit. Doctors and nurses were observed in clinical practice. The adherence to hand hygiene protocols was overall poor. Doctors were more likely to adhere to protocols than nurses (83.3% vs. 66%). However, techniques of glove removal were universally satisfactory. Strategies for improvement in hand hygiene are suggested. These include performance feedback and use of posters.