This study evaluated the reliability and interobserver variability of five patellar height ratios as measured by two examiners on standard radiographs: Insall-Salvati (IS), modified Insall-Salvati (MIS), Blackburne-Peel (BP), Caton-Deschamps (CD), and Labelle-Laurin (LL). Plain lateral radiographs with a knee flexion angle of 20 degrees for IS, MIS, BP, and CD ratios and 90 degrees for the LL method of 22 knees of 21 patients with varying pathological knee conditions were analyzed. Statistical results revealed a low interobserver variability with high correlation coefficients (0.86 for IS, 0.82 for MIS, 0.86 for BP, 0.92 for CD, and 0.81 for LL; P > 0.3) and low mean interobserver errors. However, regarding the reliability of the radiographic results of the different methods for patella alta, baja, or norma we found varying results in 68% of the patients. In two patients the patellar height was classified as alta, norma, or baja depending on the ratio used. Regarding the definitions of patellar height used by the authors of these methods, we found the lowest number of normal patellae with the IS ratio and no patella alta for the CD ratio. The LL method revealed the highest number of patella alta. The BP ratio showed intermediate results for both patella alta and baja, being the most moderate method. This study showed that there was a good interobserver reliability for the evaluation of patellar height according to the common radiological ratios. However, the high frequency of differing results between the different radiographic ratios showed that patellar height classification as "alta," "norma," or "baja" depends heavily on the chosen index. The differing results were due mainly to the normative patellar height data and to anatomical differences. Based on these findings we recommend a ratio using the articular surface of the patella in relation to the joint line. We recommend the BP method because it revealed the lowest interobserver variability and discriminated best among the groups alta, norma, and baja.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the initial fixation strength of a biodegradable interference screw compared with press-fit fixation and a titanium interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Porcine lower limbs were used. The specimens underwent 500 loading cycles between 60 and 250 N. This corresponds to loads in the graft during aggressive rehabilitation. Thereafter, intact specimens were loaded to failure. Failure mode was defined by visual analysis. Under cyclic loads none of the interference screw fixations failed. In the press-fit group (angle between load axis and tunnel axis 80 degrees), five specimens failed. The mean maximal load to failure was 945 N (+/- 87) for the titanium screw, 797 N (+/- 60) for the biodegradable screw, and 708 N (+/- 211) for the five press-fit specimens that did not fail during cyclic loading. With respect to primary fixation strength, biodegradable screws are a reasonable alternative to titanium interference screws. The press-fit fixation did not provide a secure fixation in all cases. Five press-fit specimens failed under cyclic loads comparable with those seen under conditions of accelerated rehabilitation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.