Aim: Evaluate the role of primary definitive surgery on the treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Methods: Patients with a perforated peptic ulcer occurring in the period from 1983 until 1993 were studied retrospectively by evaluating inpatient and outpatient records in combination with a general practitioners’ inquiry. Short-term and long-term results were assessed with regard to type of surgical treatment, i.e., simple closure (SC) alone versus highly selective vagotomy (HSV) with SC. Results: Forty out of 81 patients (49%) that were available for long-term follow-up had recurrent ulcer disease (complaints), of which 28 out of 61 of the SC group (46%) and 12 out of 20 of the HSV group (60%). Moreover, in 17 patients treated with SC, but preoperatively judged to need a HSV or meeting the criteria for a HSV, only 7 patients (41%) had recurrent ulcer disease. Conclusion: Primary definitive surgery in perforated peptic ulcer disease has no advantages over SC. Treatment should thus consist of SC of the perforation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.