CorrectionSahai AV, Paquin SC, Gariépy G et al. A prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration results obtained in the same lesion, with and without the needle stylet. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 900 -903In results, primary outcome, paragraph 2, the last sentence The first pass was S+ in 25/46 (54 % [95 % CI 39 -69]) and S-in 21/46 (46 % [95 % CI 31 -61]) should read:Due to an unrecognized limitation in the pass assignment sequence, all the cases retained for analysis were S+ first.
CorrectionSahai AV et al. EUS-FNA with and without needle stylet … Endoscopy 2011; 43: 168 Downloaded by: Rutgers University. Copyrighted material.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.