Our data regarding the largest reported series of nongastrointestinal MALT lymphomas confirm the good prognosis of this particular clinicopathologic entity and the significant efficacy of different therapeutic approaches to specific sites.

NCT00510926, NCT00514488, NCT00769327, NCT00481052.

Increased angiogenic activity has been demonstrated in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and essential thrombocythemia (ET) by both bone marrow microvessel density evaluation and measurement of circulating angiogenic factors. MMM is probably the disease with the more pronounced angiogenesis among myeloproliferative disorders but the significance of this finding remains speculative since the angiogenic activity is not correlated with any of the clinical and laboratory features of the disease. Circulating serum levels of angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) were found increased in MMM, CML and ET but the frequent thrombocytosis that accompanies these diseases could limit the interpretation of these data since platelets and megakaryocytes may be considered a major source at least for VEGF. However, CML patients treated with interferon were found to have lower VEGF and HGF levels than untreated or hydroxyurea-treated patients, thus suggesting a possible antiangiogenic mechanism of this drug. In addition, preliminary experiences with the antiangiogenic drug thalidomide have shown therapeutic activity in some myeloproliferative disorders.

The CD44 cell surface proteoglycan participates in a variety of CD44v6 has been also described in high-grade, but not in functions including lymphohematopoiesis, lymphocyte homing low-grade, non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. [25][26][27] and tumor metastasis. In addition to the standard form Upon interaction with its natural ligand, or when ligated by addition to these clinical and biological parameters, serum

The approval of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has generated an unmet need for baseline molecular parameters associated with inadequate imatinib responses. We correlated and transcripts at diagnosis with the outcome-defined by the 2013 European LeukemiaNet recommendations-of 272 patients newly diagnosed with CML receiving imatinib 400 mg/daily. Applying receiver-operating characteristic curves, we defined and levels associated with lower probabilities of optimal response, failure-free (FFS), event-free (EFS), transformation-free (TFS), and overall survival (OS). With a median follow-up of 60 months, 65.4% of patients achieved an optimal response (OR), 5.6% were classified as "warnings," 22.4% failed imatinib, and 6.6% switched to a different TKI because of drug intolerance. We recorded 19 deaths (6.9%), seven (2.5%) attributable to disease progression. We found that higher levels at diagnosis were associated with inferior rates of OR ( < 0.001), FFS ( < 0.001), and EFS ( < 0.001). Elevated levels were also associated with lower rates of TFS ( = 0.029) but not with OS ( = 0.132). Similarly, high levels at diagnosis were associated with inferior rates of OR ( = 0.03), FFS ( = 0.001), and EFS ( = 0.005), but not with TFS ( = 0.167) or OS ( = 0.052). However, in internal validation experiments, outperformed in samples collected at diagnosis as the latter produced 80% misclassification rates. Our data suggest that high transcripts at diagnosis measured using as a reference gene identify patients with CML unlikely to benefit from standard-dose imatinib. .

Background Despite an improvement in treatment response, high-risk multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts) experience early relapse and short disease-free survival. Together with more validated high-risk features, high levels of circulating plasma cells (high CPC) have been considered a marker of aggressive disease and poor outcome (F. Gay et al, ASH 2019; W.I. Gonsalves et al, Am J Hematol 2020). To date, there are no uniform data on the optimal cut-off predictive of clinical outcome. No prospective data on CPC are available in the setting of novel-drug clinical trials with comprehensive baseline evaluation and minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment. Aims 1) To identify the best cut-off for CPC to predict progression-free survival (PFS); 2) to assess the impact of high CPC levels on the clinical outcome of newly diagnosed (ND)MM pts in the context of concomitant risk features and MRD evaluation. Methods In the multicenter randomized FORTE clinical trial, 474 NDMM pts ≤65 years were randomized (R1) to receive either: carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd) induction-autologous stem-cell transplant-KRd consolidation (KRd_ASCT); KRd for 12 cycles (KRd12); or carfilzomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (KCd) induction-ASCT-KCd consolidation (KCd_ASCT). Thereafter, pts were randomized (R2) to maintenance treatment with lenalidomide alone (R) or plus carfilzomib (KR). MRD was assessed by 2nd-generation multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC, sensitivity 10-5) in pts who achieved ≥very good partial response before maintenance and then every 6 months. At diagnosis, single-platform FC was used to sort and count CPC. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to define a cut-off based on PFS at 36 months as outcome. Correlations between high CPC and the most important baseline prognostic features (age, International Staging System (ISS), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), chromosomal abnormalities (CA) by FISH [(del17p, t(4;14), t(14;16), t(11;14), amp1q, del1p, del13], Revised-ISS (R-ISS)) were explored. Hence, we performed a multivariate (MV) analysis to assess the impact of high CPC on the achievement of MRD negativity, on PFS and OS. Finally, we evaluated the impact of baseline CPC and MRD achievement. Results CPC analysis was performed in 401/474 pts at diagnosis; median follow-up was 44.2 months (39.6-47.9) and baseline features were similar to those reported in the overall FORTE population. Median CPC were 0.02% (IQR 0-0.14). The optimal CPC cut-off to predict PFS (ROC analysis) was 0.07% (5 cells/ul, 0.005 x109/l) and was consistent with a cut-off previously identified as a predictor of sustained MRD negativity (MRDsus12; L. Bertamini et al, EHA 2020). High-CPC pts (&gt;0.07%) were 130/401 (32%), while 271/401 (68%) had low CPC (≤0.07%). The proportion of high-CPC pts was comparable among treatment arms. Baseline features significantly associated with high CPC in a MV analysis were: ISS II/III, high LDH, amp1q, t(4;14), t(14;16) and bone marrow plasma cells (&gt;60%). Regarding PFS, in a MV analysis adjusted for R-ISS and R1 treatment, including all the baseline features, high CPC were associated with a lower PFS (HR 2.49, 95% CI 1.76-3.51, P&lt;0.0001; 3-year PFS rates 47% for high CPC vs 78% for low CPC; Fig. 1A). Similarly, patients with high CPC had a worse OS compared with patients with low CPC (3-year OS rates 78% for high CPC vs 93% for low CPC; HR 2.85, 95% CI 1.56-5.19, P=0.0006; Fig. 1B). The impact of baseline CPC levels on PFS was consistent in all high-risk subgroups (Fig. 1C), except in those patients who achieved pre-maintenance MRD negativity [(neg); interaction P=0.03]. Low-CPC and MRD-neg pts showed the best outcome with a 3-year PFS of 84%. Low-CPC MRD-positive (pos) and high-CPC MRD-neg pts had similar 3-year PFS (70% vs 68%). High-CPC MRD-pos pts had a dismal outcome (3-year PFS 32%; Fig. 1D). Conclusion High CPC with a cut-off of 0.07% (5 cells/ul, 0.005 x109/l) is a strong and independent high-risk factor, predicting a shorter PFS and OS even in the context of other high-risk features. The achievement of MRD neg independently improved the poor prognosis of high-CPC patients. Figure 1 Disclosures D'Agostino: GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Galieni:Janssen: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Molica:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Tacchetti:Oncopeptides: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Musto:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Gay:GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Boccadoro:GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Research Funding. Oliva:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: The presentation includes discussion of off-label use of a drug or drugs for the treatment of multiple myeloma (including carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide and dexamethasone).

Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is an incurable disorder of B cells. Following occasional reports of response to alpha interferon (IFN) and in view of its effectiveness in hairy cell leukemia, we tested this agent in a relatively large group (n = 88) of patients who had an IgM monoclonal component (MC) greater than 10 g/l. Thirty eight patients had a MC > 30 g/l and were classified as Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM), while fifty had either WM in an early stage or an IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undeterminated significance (all of them operationally classified as IgM-MGUS). All patients received IFN 3 MU/day for one month and then 3 times/week. Response to treatment was mainly based on MC reduction in two consecutive determinations (> 50%: major response; 25-50%: minor response). Of 36 evaluable WM patients, 12 had a major and 6 a minor response; of 41 evaluable IgM-MGUS patients, 2 had a major and 6 a minor response. In WM patients with a major response, MC reduction was associated with disappearance of hyperviscosity symptoms, raised Hb level and reduced bone marrow lymphoplasmacytosis. At the dose used, tolerance was excellent in the majority of patients; only 15% withdrew from the study due to side effects. Although single cases and very small series have already been reported, no large study collecting quantitative data on the effects of alpha IFN in WM has been published so far. Our results suggest that IFN treatment is not indicated for patients with a low monoclonal component, while it is of clinical benefit in about 50% of patients with IgM > 30 g/l.

This report presents the totality of evidence through a systematic review that assessed either the efficacy or safety of bortezomib-based regimens in multiple myeloma with renal impairment. A systematic and comprehensive search of the literature was performed using MEDLINE databases from 1978 to December 1, 2010, and a hand search of references. We used the following medical subject headings (MESH) to identify potential studies: ‘myeloma renal failure’ (1,225 hits) and ‘bortezomib’ (2,554 hits). An additional search performed by combining the MESH terms ‘myeloma renal failure’ and ‘bortezomib’ yielded 50 citations. Five additional case-control studies judged relevant for the purpose of study were also included. In total, 6 case reports, 9 case series and 9 case-control studies were identified that reported on myeloma, renal failure and bortezomib. In this review, only the case series and case-control studies were considered. The results of our search led to the following conclusions: (1) bortezomib is feasible and well tolerated and its efficacy and safety are not substantially modified by renal failure patients, (2) renal failure should not induce physicians to reduce doses, since the efficacy of bortezomib is attained also in dialyzed patients who may achieve dialysis independence, and (3) standard doses of bortezomib (i.e. 1.3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, 8, 11) associated with dexamethasone yield satisfactory tumor response, generally obtained shortly after starting therapy. Although many questions remain unanswered, our effort should be considered a relevant scientific and practical address for generating a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm to be used in patients with renal impairment related to multiple myeloma.